Does anyone agree with me that Tom Bombadil should have been in Fellowship of the Ring?? He was 1 of my favorites in the book, and I was extremely dissapointed that Pete Jackson didn't include him in the movie.
2006-08-26 15:08:08 · 7 answers · asked by uzorbot 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I didn't read the books until after the first movie and I was very dissappointed the Tom wasn't included. He seemed like such a strong character and embodied what was magical about Tolkien's world. I still think the trilogy is one of the best pieces of cinema ever, though.
2006-08-26 15:13:43 · answer #1 · answered by abaucco70 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree with you, i understand that not everything from the book could be in the movie, but Tom Bombadil was a really important character of the first book and should be at least mentioned someway
2006-08-26 15:20:29 · answer #2 · answered by Silvia C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that Jackson made frequent reference in his pre-release interviews about the Tom Bombadil sequence from "LOTR." He regretted that he wasn't able to use it, but...think about it: a 1,500-page epic can't ALL be distilled down into even 9 hours of film. Something(s) had to be cut.
2006-08-26 17:12:33 · answer #3 · answered by shkspr 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree. Tom was magical.
2006-08-26 15:11:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea i was sad when i didnt see tom in it
2006-08-26 16:12:18 · answer #5 · answered by Dont get Infected 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no....he was't cool like the rest of them...and 2 old,LOL:)
2006-08-26 18:20:31 · answer #6 · answered by onetreehunny 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
*raises hand, nods in agreement*
2006-08-26 15:23:21 · answer #7 · answered by decababe 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋