A reverse stock "split" usually happens when a company's stock has perfomed so poorly that the stock is in danger of being delisted from a stock exhange. Also, a very cheap stock - such as one well under $5.00 - is often considered a very poor risk and disregarded by mutual funds and stock analysts. A company does a reverse - say 1 for 10 reverse of a stock selling for $2.00 - in order to raise the price to $20.00. For every 10 shares you had worth $2.00, you now own one at $20.00. The reverse doesn't change any of the fundamental reasons that the stock was doing so lousy in the first place. Most financial advisors would suggest staying away from the stock unless you love high-risk gambling or unless you are really confident you know a lot more about the company than the rest of the investment community knows about it.
2006-08-26 14:49:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by sadder_but_wiser 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Technically you are losing no value. Your 10 shares at $5, just became 5 share at 10$. You still have $50 in shares. It does probably indicate that the stock has been dropping, but this is not a concrete indicator of its future performance.
2006-08-26 18:06:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hi, i know what your question means. i also think stock market is a nice place for investing.
I found some useful tips in stock trading. It includes stock basics, how to protect your profit, find a potential increase share, control and manage stock risk, when to sell/buy stock and so on.
http://www.bernanke.cn/stock-trade/
Best Wishes && Good Luck!
2006-08-27 03:41:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by stock_trade_expert 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
It allows funds to purchase shares they normally would not.
2017-03-07 22:32:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by . 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
One inventory that did a opposite chop up that i understand approximately became iciness activities Inc. an extremely wealthy guy have been given controlling pastime then voted in a opposite chop up the place shares that have been interior the 30 dollar selection went to various thousand for one share and you weren't allowed to own partial shares. of direction he offered those human beings out so he greater his administration. So it became undesirable using fact it compelled out the smaller investor. the agency is a ski motel and it trades OTC for around $30,000.00 in keeping with share now.
2016-09-30 00:56:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
From a value point of view... it makes no immediate difference.
Historically, it has been an advance warning that the value of your investment is going down (not all the time... but enough to where you should be concerned).
2006-08-26 16:34:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Common Sense 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bad.
2006-08-27 18:38:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not necessarily bad, but probably bad.
2006-08-26 14:38:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think statistically, splits don't matter, either way..
2006-08-26 14:39:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by kvuo 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
bad...it's the kiss of death
2006-08-26 16:24:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by -* 4
·
0⤊
1⤋