Science and astrology should be fused as one, or at least seen as a common interest?
With the recent change of planets (with the ommission of pluto), I'm sure the astrologers are upset, as it could disrupt the interpretation or understanding of astrology and our sun signs.
2006-08-26 14:23:13 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Hi. Science is for understanding, astrology is for entertainment. When science becomes entertainment it no longer has the objectivity it needs to improve our understanding and becomes useless. So, no, I don't think they should be fused.
2006-08-29 10:00:46 · answer #1 · answered by Cirric 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont think that astrology has anything to do with science, that is why it has DIVERGED from scientific thought over the centuries. if it were science, astrology would still be considered part of scientific thought and there would be no fusing necessary. if pluto affected our actions from 1930-2006, it would not be different before or after that time period, just based on classification.
2006-08-26 23:57:33 · answer #2 · answered by hanumistee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
um .. astrology has nothing to do with science .
and i dont see why you want science and astrology fused as one. science is for real people , astrology is for dreamers .
put the bottle down before asking a question lol
2006-08-27 00:08:02 · answer #3 · answered by spaceprt 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Astrology is not a science - it is easy to show that the predictions astrology makes are wrong.
2006-08-26 22:22:10 · answer #4 · answered by kris 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Heck, they didn't have Pluto prior to 1934 or whenever it was. I am sure they can adjust. The seem to have done fine considering the sun isn't even in the alleged constellation about 1/3 of the time due to calendar adjustments.
2006-08-28 02:15:36 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. Quark 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Astrology is pseudo science. Kinda like psychology. ;)
2006-08-26 21:28:08 · answer #6 · answered by Nick Name 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋