2006-08-26 14:14:41 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
My dear sweet Cobb, Happy belated 104th birthday; that happened in the blink of an eye. The answer to your question, which I'm sure you've already forgotten by now, is no. Bless your precious antiquated heart.
2006-08-27 05:41:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
should all the stares be merged into one? huh? and no all of the new england states shouldn't be merged. don't be jealous that we're so awesome. they should merge all those middle states because they're all the same anyway
2006-08-26 21:24:45 · answer #2 · answered by Kris 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They would have to agree to merge. I doubt the would as it would result in less representation in the Senate. Merging the state governments would also be a problem.
2006-08-26 21:23:34 · answer #3 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why? And how would you merge stares into a state anyway?
2006-08-26 21:22:12 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The United Left of America
2006-08-26 21:16:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. The people of each state are used to doing things their own way. Plus, we'd have to change the flag, and I like having 50 stars.
2006-08-26 21:23:21 · answer #6 · answered by timm1776 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps it would save money but it will never happen because each of the politicians in the various states want to keep their own kingdom and it will NEVER happen.
2006-08-26 21:17:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No way - each state is too individualistic to be merged.
2006-08-26 21:17:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nonsense.
2006-08-26 21:20:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only if other states are allowed to do the same thing.
2006-08-26 21:21:02 · answer #10 · answered by S.A.M. Gunner 7212 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋