what say you?
2006-08-26 12:44:03 · 9 answers · asked by Work In Progress 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
okay.. misspoke(typed) congress will up hold his dissions.
2006-08-26 12:54:01 · update #1
What crime do you think he committed? Iraq? Ha ha! Clinton told us Iraq had WMDs years before Bush took office. Also the war was voted on and approved off by congress BEFORE we went in. Bush is bullet proof because he really hasn't done anything wrong. Of course their are Islamic propogandists paid by Iran on this board who will disagree but its best to ignore enemy propoganda.
2006-08-26 12:48:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
U.S. Const. Art. I § 3, cl. 6
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
2006-08-26 19:48:32 · answer #2 · answered by Hank 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
... that's what bush is hoping for...
but by that same token, you could argue charlie manson didn't commit any crime... at least in some crazy person's interpretation of the law...
but I don't think the courts will be so supportive of some of his actions... they have already struck down some of his ideas...
and I'm thinking more about abramoff and CIA leak...
2006-08-26 19:51:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
the hole point of a law writen down is so that it only has a few interpreation. but i think the sumpreme court doesnt want to say oh bush did this he needs to go to jail or what not becouse if they did he would just say that they were standing in the way of the war on terriosm.
2006-08-26 19:52:34 · answer #4 · answered by ah64dtk 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What crime did Bush commit?
2006-08-26 19:48:08 · answer #5 · answered by amosunknown 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You sound like a typical criminal defense lawyer trying to defend his scumbag client whom he knows is guilty. C'mon Jellyman, you're smarter than that.
2006-08-26 20:02:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They will support anything, they have turned the law into a joke! They put him in there in the first place!
He was appointed, not elected!
2006-08-26 19:48:05 · answer #7 · answered by helixburger 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
that is the way it works with the carter and clinton appointed federal judges that allow terrorist rights! so Yes is the answer to your question
2006-08-26 19:47:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Keep think that......it MIGHT work for you
2006-08-26 19:46:42 · answer #9 · answered by topher5984 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋