Take out, to you.
2006-08-26 11:34:03 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Iran and Syria.
2006-08-26 11:51:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nukes don't see imaginary political boundaries drawn on maps. Attack any place and the resulting side effect will last centuries spreading around the world affecting everyone. All those ignoramuses who yack about "bomb that country!" "nuke that place!" etc are simply trolling, far from expressing an opinion.
2006-08-26 11:42:15 · answer #2 · answered by interstate_101 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Paraguay
2006-08-26 11:42:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
North Korea, Iran, and Syria.
2006-08-26 11:39:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Launch them all and to hell with countries - the human race is corrupt and evil, it is time for life to start over.
2006-08-26 12:48:19 · answer #5 · answered by Mordent 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
America, the only county ever to use them. To be fair, also the only country likely to use them again in my lifetime.
2006-08-26 12:58:12 · answer #6 · answered by Daryl R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd probably start with North Korea. Once it was clear I was willing to use them if necessary, I doubt it would be necessary again.
2006-08-26 12:46:05 · answer #7 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The USA. Under 5% of the world's population, over 25% of the world's carbon dioxide emissions. Time they went. Destroy them before they destroy the planet ;-)
2006-08-26 11:45:59 · answer #8 · answered by philr999 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
China. As an 'off the cuff' answer.
2006-08-26 11:46:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
we would all suffer in the end so i'd prefer not to, but if i was pushed it would be iran, or if i'm honest, a few other muslim countries too.
2006-08-26 11:40:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋