2006-08-26 11:11:22 · 6 answers · asked by prettyqbee07 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
the fall of Jesusalem was the result of a specific military operation, intended to do just that. They levelled the city and rebuilt it.
The fall of Rome was a long, drawn out process, the result both of attacks from invaders, and the decline of the civilization within the Empire
2006-08-26 12:21:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the fall of Jerusalem occurred because the Jews in Jerusalem tried to leave the Roman Empire and the Romans defeated them. The Roman Empire was destroyed by Gothic tribes and the Romans were trying to save the Roman Empire.
2006-08-26 11:28:12 · answer #2 · answered by bumpocooper 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it was totally different see The fall of Rome in Glencoe.com
2006-08-26 11:18:04 · answer #3 · answered by pelancha 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rome fell in the fifth century.
2006-08-26 11:20:05 · answer #4 · answered by Bullwinkle Moose 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not at all, Jerusalem fell under a greater power. while rome fell under a group of inferior people. the greatest civilation was put on their knees by a bunch of barbarians. it would be like if washington dc was invaded n conquered by amazonic indians
2006-08-26 17:46:08 · answer #5 · answered by Slim Dogg 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. They fell for completely different reasons and at different times.
2006-08-26 15:21:19 · answer #6 · answered by K 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋