English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It seems like the liberals think so. Who wants war? Noone, but with the fascism in Islam, what is the alternative besides wearing burkhas and carrying around the Koran?

Why do liberals vent their anger toward conservatives rather than the people that hang people from bridges that don't believe in Islam? Are liberals just as braindead as the Islamofascists?

http://www.faithfreedom.org/Gallery/8.htm

2006-08-26 10:35:39 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Check this gallery out:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Gallery/7.htm

2006-08-26 10:36:45 · update #1

The methods, Cora? Please inform us of how we can play with the Islamofascists. No solutions once again.

2006-08-26 10:38:57 · update #2

13 answers

well i once seen a liberal with a half a brain and he was considered gifted

2006-08-26 10:37:48 · answer #1 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 2 2

When "fans" started getting involved instead of Americans like us.
Be careful what you say, man. You're gonna stir up a hornet's nest, as I'm sure you're looking forward to doing. I personally don't like being quite so vocal on the subject because I think it's a bit tasteless.
It's Qur'an. Not Koran by the way. At least get your homework done if you're going to get on here and show your butt.

2006-08-26 17:50:25 · answer #2 · answered by mom 4 · 0 0

John, (may I call you John?) you post frequently on this topic.

If you want to examine the elements of fanaticism (this requires a certain amount of open-mindedness on your part) it consists of "excessive or overweening devotion...to the exclusion of other plans or points of view."

Since most of the questions you post seem to indicate a positive enthusiasm for war ("what is the alternative?", you asked, but immediately dismissed the existence of any alternatives), I would suggest that you are excluding other possibilites and points of view.

Conservatives are defined in part as "opposed to change." Now, this can apply to many things, but in the instance you refer to, specifically the American Christians/Israeli Jews vs Muslims war, it becomes truly problematic.

The problem with waging war against an opponent who outnumbers you so greatly as Muslims outnumber American Christians and their allies, is that there is nothing to do but escalate. There will always be more of them than there are of you. The only way to eliminate the 'alternative' you speak of ( not from reality, but from your mind) is to get rid of all of them.

So, having embarked on this insane, ill-considered, disastrous course, you are unwilling to acknowledge its flaws, consider other possible courses of action or points of view, and unwilling to change. This also fits with the requirements of fanaticism.

You would escalate the whole world to destruction to calm your fears, and your missish concern over how you would look in a burka. Shame.

2006-08-26 18:36:39 · answer #3 · answered by functionary01 4 · 0 0

The hard-left Liberals (not the majority of Liberals) live in a fantasy world. Most of them REALLY believe that if we would just talk to Osama bin Laden, that he would see the evil of his ways, and would become a kind, gentle spirit, and then all the violence in the Middle East would stop. They just absolutely refuse to believe that Islamic terrorists want to kill Hillary Clinton, Dick Durbin, Joe Biden, Ted Kennedy, and Barbara Boxer just as much as they want to kill President Bush, Dick Cheney, Condi Rice, and Donald Rumsfeld. They think that the terrorists are interested in peaceful resolutions. They just simply can't understand that terrorists don't want peace of any kind. They want to kill anyone who disagrees with them. Period. All Americans are evil to them. Democrats sell big, beautiful ideas of world peace, the thought of which appeals to everyone, but their idea of world peace means weakening America by giving in to terrorists' demands and desires (like pulling out of Iraq at this point, and not demanding Iran stop their nuclear program). Defending America is considered radical by far-left liberals because it sets rules and parameters for protecting our country, and the hard-left libs don't like rules that hinder their ultimate goal of a global community. Hillary Clinton is weak, and she will do irreparable harm to this country if people do not wise up before the 2008 Presidential election.

2006-08-26 17:52:52 · answer #4 · answered by dgindiansfan 4 · 1 0

Since Bush declared his war on Islam making billions in the world eimies of America

2006-08-26 17:43:55 · answer #5 · answered by incredible22 3 · 0 0

Nobody I know! I am enjoying the pissing match between Amera-Facsists and the Islamo-fascists. It's like a ULTIMATE UFC for primetime tellie!

Don't go messin' up my programming now.

Islamo-Fascist... I like it, I really do!

2006-08-26 18:36:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I wasn't aware anyone was doing that... I am aware that they are trying to gain control of the oil in a foreign land and make it a US colony, though.

2006-08-26 17:37:53 · answer #7 · answered by ceprn 6 · 0 2

It's not the goal it's the methods.

Just like the goal of teaching people about your religion might be good, but killing anyone who doesn't convert is fanatical.

2006-08-26 17:37:40 · answer #8 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2 3

You've opened up the old " John Skerry " account I see. You don't fool me, Ah-Ha,Farkas 419, etc...

Give me a negative rating, now do you? How bout you open up "Ah Ha ( the first one) oh wait, that's suspended!!!!

2006-08-26 17:39:57 · answer #9 · answered by FootballFan1012 6 · 1 3

since Bush started killing people for oil...

2006-08-26 17:52:05 · answer #10 · answered by me 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers