Don't you think that they should get one? Should they be individual or together? Should the have one each and one together?
2006-08-26 08:54:57 · 9 answers · asked by SPLATT 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I would like to see George Bush on a U.S. postage stamp first because you cannot be on a stamp in the U.S. until you are dead and The Clintons deserve to live much longer than the slime-ball idiot currently sitting in The White House.
2006-08-26 10:31:17 · answer #1 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Though I think really highly of the Clintons, especially our former, better President (ahem), I honestly don't think they've done anything to merit being on a stamp...yet.
2006-08-26 09:29:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, we could put Bill on a $1 bill, and Hillary on a $5 bill, and Bush on a $7 bill.
2006-08-26 10:40:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Every President should be honored with a stamp at least - for what Clinton did for his economic boom, he should probably be next in line for a portrait on some currency also - maybe just a collector's item type coin
2006-08-26 09:05:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, it's too boring. People have to be dead or really great at something in order to deserve one. I don't see them getting any Nobel peace prizes in the future.
Besides, no one would buy them because over half the country hates them.
2006-08-26 09:00:49 · answer #5 · answered by Shiara 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
you have to be important to be on a postage stamp and those two liberal loosers only qualify for the hall of shame!!!
2006-08-26 09:25:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is a joke, right?
2006-08-26 09:00:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I won't want to see either of their faces
2006-08-26 09:00:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anastasia 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
and where would u see it ?
underneath buses?
2006-08-26 09:01:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋