i believe that hes guilty but then the question about why he took so long to come out .. can it really be that hes obsessed with the case?
2006-08-26 06:04:17 · 12 answers · asked by a curious lady 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
do u guys think that being all the focus was on the mom and the couldnt get her especially now that shes dead.. do u feel the police has to pin it on someone>
2006-08-26 06:12:45 · update #1
innocent of murder yes. innocent of crazy and skeeziness,NO
2006-08-28 10:45:00 · answer #1 · answered by New Mommy! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I Think He Is Obsessed And Demented And Is Innocent, I Think They Should Look Into It More. And Although The Mom Isn't Guilty (I Don't Think) I Think She Is In A Way Though. Parading Her Daughter Around And Someone Else Did Become Obsessed Too And Eventually Killed Her. How SAD Is That?
2006-08-26 06:12:13 · answer #2 · answered by Summer 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm up in the air about this. I spent so much time thinking that the mom was guilty based on what info I learned from TV that I never really thought about anyone else. It is a shock to think an outsider did this.
2006-08-26 06:10:29 · answer #3 · answered by mjkinoh 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he is not quilty, look at who is making money off of it? Book and movie deals. They are talking about the actor that is going to play Karr?. Even his own family is cashing in, because they know that he did not do it.
Who is paying for his defends? Trial will go on for months just to prove that he is a nut and wanted a free ride back to USA flying first class.
2006-08-26 07:02:17 · answer #4 · answered by timer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is guilty for sure. I think the police just didn't do a good investigation and where in over their heads. They focused to much on the family and didn't investigate other leads. Also the press had decided who did it and worked to put that across just for the headlines.
2006-08-26 11:28:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really don't know what to think of him. The only thing I can think about is how all he would say publicly is that he was there. He never said that he did it, just that he was there, and it was accidental. Maybe someone else was there, too?
2006-08-26 07:01:56 · answer #6 · answered by J. M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While intriguing, I really don't give a puckey if he's innocent or guilty.
2006-08-26 07:00:28 · answer #7 · answered by Sick Puppy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think hes innocent i mean who would just blurb out what they did like after 10 years of it being slient
2006-08-26 07:10:28 · answer #8 · answered by ickyvicky20 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is guilty of something but I don't think he actually committed the murder, he at least had something to do with it though.
2006-08-26 06:12:23 · answer #9 · answered by girlfromflorida 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i am not really sure, part of me is saying he did it but the other part says he is a crazy guy who just wants all the attention
2006-08-26 06:13:40 · answer #10 · answered by oxoxtedybxoxo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋