English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't. In an effort to head toward peace in their country many tribal leaders have pledged to at least try and put an end to the sectarian violence that has plagued the nation of Iraq. It's no guarnatee but at least some are agreeing the constant violence isn't what they want.

Who knows there may be many in this group that know the fastest way to get the US troops out of Iraq is to quit fighting. What do you think?

2006-08-26 05:35:12 · 3 answers · asked by namsaev 6 in News & Events Current Events

3 answers

I think most of the Iraqis don't want US to leave Iraq. That is why they are trying to find ways to keep them in their country.

2006-08-26 05:46:31 · answer #1 · answered by Phalguni K 1 · 0 0

At this point in time with Iran exercising its nuclear options, it might not be such a bad idea to have US troops stationed in Iraq. Otherwise, Iran may take over the weak government of Iraq. The civil war in Iraq is all about power and control. No body wants violence. If everybody would just agree that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei could be their leader. The world would be in great peace so long as everyone followed the rules of Sharia. Those who disobey would be killed by Vevak, the secret police who used to be the Savak, secret police under the Shah of Iran.

Because there is a majority of Shiite Muslims in Iran, Syria and Lebanon, that part of the world could be the first to enjoy the peacefulness. Then one by one the rest of the world would fall in line.

Or, would you rather have US troops stationed in Iraq and fight for a more secular government?

2006-08-26 13:12:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

always have and always will, if only george bush had done his homework?

2006-08-26 22:15:21 · answer #3 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers