Why can't Bush, Cheney, Rove et al, volunteer to take a polygraph. That will finally put many peoples suspicion to rest.
2006-08-26 05:34:05 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
thomasrobins, I see because you are not free to say this in some parts of the world absolves the Govt. here from wrong doing. What a dreadful argument? It is obviously because you cannot give me or anybody else something substantive to work with.
2006-08-26 05:48:53 · update #1
To help doubters here, I am part of a community in which the US government was prepared to and did, inject with live syphillis to see what the outcome would be. President Clinton apologised for it. Please don't come here with your sanctimonious claims of a perfect USA.
2006-08-26 05:54:46 · update #2
taking a polygraph test would certaintly give credence to their answers and it should make a lot of americans feel much better toward them , providing it is given by a independant operator,
2006-08-26 05:47:34 · answer #1 · answered by jim ex marine offi, 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You poor darling! Bill Clinton apologized for giving you the syphilis that is now taking what little is left of your already diminutive mind. Did he take a polygraph over illegal campaign contributions from China for top secret missile guidance technology or giving nuclear reactor and fissionable material that North Korea now uses to threaten the world with? Would it come out that it was actually Your little blue dress? You poor dear! Are just one more in the Long Line of those that claim he raped them? Quick! While Hillary is in the news, write a tell all and do the talk circuit.
2006-08-26 14:11:26 · answer #2 · answered by trumain 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that should be necessary.
After all look at his time in office and you can tell the things he knows and doesn't know.
He knows where the coffee pot is at his Crawford Ranch
He can't find the kitchen in the White house.
He likes to operate a chainsaw in Crawford
He is uncomfortable operating a microphone in Washington
He drives his own pick-up truck in Texas
He has been in the riders seat in Washington.
He was clueless I don't blame him for not preventing 9/11.
He is still clueless about what has happened in the last 6 years.
Go big Red Go
2006-08-26 12:56:08 · answer #3 · answered by 43 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why should anyone take a polygraph test to put a bunch of nut jobs at ease. The nut jobs are the ones that need the help. I am perfectly comfortable with the truth as I saw it in regards to 9/11.
2006-08-26 12:48:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Humanist - why on earth don't you find something better to write about. Do you seriously believe that 9/11 was instigated by the Government. If so, you are certifiably insane. Free Speech allows you to say such things in the US, but try saying similar things in other parts of the world against their Presidents and government. You would probably be jailed, tortured and most likely killed. Free Speech is a wonderful thing but Crap Speech is not worth a fig...............
2006-08-26 12:41:53 · answer #5 · answered by thomasrobinsonantonio 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why should they, I don't remember them being accused of anything. But of course in your little fansty world they have been. Should we find out if they believe in Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny too? How about lets put Clinton, Gore and Hillary on the polygraph too see what they are hiding?
2006-08-26 12:50:09 · answer #6 · answered by fjrnj 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
it really wouldn't make much difference...we all know they had information they just chose to not take it seriously...now i hate bush and all his flunkies BUT in his defense if someone said "hey there is a group of crazy Arabs who are going to take over planes...and get this fly them in to the world trade center..." that shi t had to have been so far out in left field who would have believed that it was gonna happen....when i heard it i didn't believe it...but the lie detector wouldnt make it not have happened and it isnt going to bring anyone back. and if bush were going to be impeached or punished in any way it would have been done by now.
2006-08-26 12:42:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Honey Id bet they could fool a lie detector ....They lie for a living And of course a lie detector doesn't mean anything to conservatives ,you all lie so freely You said it yourself and lol proudly
2006-08-26 12:42:29 · answer #8 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
you are completely right. if they have nothing to hide, prove it.i would be very, very interested in their results of one an i pray they are innocent, it would be terrible if they were involved in any way at all to all those that lost their lives on that dreadful day, i think i would never trust ANYONE ever again if they were involved. very good question, by the way.
2006-08-26 12:45:20 · answer #9 · answered by snookieoo3 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Dumbo Dubya has no knowledge of anything, so how could he have had prior knowledge? Quit overestimating the intelligence of the spoiled brats and brown-noses who come to power; that's what's really stupid about conspiracy theorists.
2006-08-26 12:43:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋