Where the islamic crusades started around 630, they ended when the seven christian Crusades(1095 and the last ending in 1291) stopped them.
Why do people deny the muslim crusades, or simply dont care to know?
2006-08-26
05:15:05
·
7 answers
·
asked by
kool_rock_ski_stickem
4
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
This includes...
638 Muslim Crusaders conquer and annex Jerusalem, taking it from the Byzantines.
638-650 Muslim Crusaders conquer Iran, except along Caspian Sea.
639-642 Muslim Crusaders conquer Egypt.
641 Muslim Crusaders control Syria and Palestine.
643-707 Muslim Crusaders conquer North Africa.
2006-08-26
05:17:21 ·
update #1
And literally hundreds of more events.
2006-08-26
05:19:54 ·
update #2
nora22000, out of Christanity, and judiasm and islam, islam is the newest, derived from both others, which are ultimately from judiasm.
2006-08-26
05:26:24 ·
update #3
And whoever thinks the muslim crusades DIDNT kill all who werent muslim, your INSANE! The muslims to this day kill to indoctrinate islam into the minds of parentless children from somalia, ethopia, to sudan. Do dont try to say these crusades were not pushing islam.
2006-08-26
05:27:32 ·
update #4
Alot of off topic fart mouth coming with these "answers"... Please read my question and answer it. Christian Crusades are always brought up, Muslim Crusades are NEVER brought up... Why does nobody care?
Your rants of equality miss the fact that not mentioning both crusades IS the inequality.
2006-08-26
18:06:00 ·
update #5
I dont deny them
It just goes to confirm that many religions physically force people to believe their way - not just the Holy Roman Empire!
and that religion in general is responsible for most of the wars that have been fought
2006-08-26 05:24:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by grammy_of_twins_plus two 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
There's a point you miss
The world consists of continents which are divided into countries and ethnic groups .... none of the inhabitants of these countries are the original ... do you know who are the originals?
Who knows if some other people inhabited Egypt before the Pharoahs? and the Pharoahs came from somewhere else and conquerre them and occupied their land.
Of course I have no proof to what I say but look around you ... which country is fully inhabited by its KNOWN originals? the answer is none.
This is the way the Earth is inhabited ... the humans fight for existance from the very early times .
There is no meaning for what you say ... yes the muslims conquerred all these lands but the question is 'how did they changed these lands? did they hate the other ... any other? or reacted with that other and made an advanced civilization?'
All lands were conquerred and not even once but so many times and the invaders are equal except the one who ruled the land with justice and gave prosperity to the people.
As for the problems that came to non-muslims after the muslim conquer ... sure there were such problems but what do you think the solution is?
Kill all these muslims and destroy them? how will you see yourself then? peacemaker? I doubt it.
You have to understand the human nature more deeply ... we are not ideal .... you have to look in equality to all the humans.
We have to live with each other in peace on that planet and I can tell that what you say is very similar to the words of Osama Binladen or Ayman al Zawahry with contrast but leading to the same result... more hatred ... this is not right
2006-08-26 11:47:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
This sounds like a crusade for dominance, rather than a religious crusade. So the name, Muslim Crusades, is a misnomer. Whereas the Christian Crusade is more about personal control and attacking people for their religious beliefs. You forget to mentions that they went primarily after anyone that didn't share their beliefs. They also had encouraged the disastrous Children Crusade in the vain beliefs that Gos would protect them and make them victorious. Many of them starved to death, captured and sold into slavery and that mostly means the sex trades, although I don't have proof of that. But in reflecting upon the world's current events, when children are left without protection, they are easy preys for abuse by predators. What there should be is a World Crusade for acceptance.
2006-08-26 05:24:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by sacredmud 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Then how did Islam spread to Indonesia, China, Philippines, Taiwan....How do European people convert to Islam every day? By crusaders? Muslims controlled all these lands but they never forced people to convert to Islam...the evidence is the presence of Christians and Jews in most of the Arab countries up to date....Everyone knows that all those lands were occupied by the Persians and the Byzantines and that neither Egypt nor north Africa was ruled from its people...Muslims built the strongest and most advanced civilization at that time while the Europeans were burning scientists.....They didn,t kill the people living in the land they acquired or rape women like European fighters did in their crusaders...The Europeans were allies to the Mongols against the Muslims knowing that they were totally unmerciful with other nations just to get rid of Islam...Don't try to disfigure the Islamic history because all your trials are to fail.
2006-08-26 22:04:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by mido 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Is every muslim war a crusade/jihad?
No, just cause they are muslims does not mean that their wars are all religious.
If all wars by religious people were religious wars, then christians have had many more bloody crusades than muslims. (Hitler's invasions for example).
Even in religiously oriented wars and massacres, christians have killed more. Think about the spanish inquisition, the holocaust the crusades, the thirty years war, the hundred years war etc.
2006-08-26 10:11:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by John S 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Number one, I've noticed this disturbing new trend to try to justify killing arabs on the baiss of the crusades.
Number two, I'm sorry - are you unaware that all over europe, christian kings fought and killed each other's peasantry to establish their kingdoms? Ever heard of the hundred years war? Agincourt? Robert the Bruce? The Spanish Armada? WWII? Ever heard of St Francis' disciples inciting anti-muslim violence in Spain?
have you ever heard of the holy roman empire?
have you ever heard of 5 million burned witches in europe?
did you ever hear of the english et al taking over all of the americans and slaughterring millions of the inhabitants?
why do people deny their own history? is it just to be able to scapegoat, blame, and get all hard about killing people (or rather, having oher people kill people for you?)
Really, man, what are you talking about? You appear to have no historical perspective or even information and you are just passing on hate. Bizzaro, man.
2006-08-26 05:23:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by t jefferson 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
What is your point?
If you're trying to prove that the Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) are violent, destructive, and counterproductive for human society, I think a lot of people are already coming to that conclusion.
If you're attempting to justify the centuries-long cruelty and violence of Christianity (still in fill swing, btw) by pointing fingers at Islamic execution of the same concepts based on the same Jewish bible, I repeat my question--What's your point?
2006-08-26 05:22:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by nora22000 7
·
1⤊
1⤋