I think Karr confessed because of his morbid fascination with the case and little girls (although he strikes me as the "little boy" type). Karr knew some facts surrounding the case that were never released but it could have been disclosed in his communications with the family or the reporter who eventually turned him in.
The police had a fairly comprehensive stack of theories against mom but most of it was either circumstantial or remained unproveable. She would have been the front tunner as far as I'm concerned, but they never had one piece of evidence that was convincing.
2006-08-26 04:44:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think its Karr. He's a sick bastard, but I believe he did all this for the attention and his fifteen minutes of glory. His story is falling apart. I always thought the parents were some how involved, but I doubt if this case will ever be sovled. The police screwed up from the get go. I hope I'm wrong about Karr, but it's just a feeling I have. Something is amiss.
2006-08-26 04:35:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here's my theory: This freaky lookin Karr guy acts as if he is playing a role, in a movie- he didn't do it, also, my intuition tells me that this man is very ill, most likely a fatal disease. I still think that Patsy Ramsey had something to do with it or knew more than she told. I also believe that she got cancer because karma rolled around to punish her for her involvement/knowledge of her beautiful daughter's murder.
2006-08-26 04:36:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I couldn't care less. We heard way, way more than enough about JonBennet a decade ago. It was media overkill like OJ Simpson and Nancy Kerrigan/Tonya Harding. I just hope the ******** media doesn't subject us to that again.
2006-08-26 06:18:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It looks to me like John Karr is the one.
2006-08-26 05:26:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by mom 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think its John Karr. They are running his DNA analysis now to see if it matches the DNA found at the scene. If it's his DNA, he's guilty, if not, someone else probably killed her.
2006-08-26 04:34:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by answer_man 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know but I don't think it was either the parents or Kerr or Karr or whatever his name is.
2006-08-26 04:31:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Fashionvista 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hard to say, This John guy says he did it but....
I need more evidence.
There is something creepy about him though.
And his facial features are really feminine.
And his eyes are shifty.
I think he's gay.
2006-08-26 04:54:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by jillian 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that the father did it and the mother helped to cover it up.
2006-08-26 04:35:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by AugustMan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The killer already died, it was the jealous mom.
2006-08-26 04:33:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by F T 5
·
0⤊
0⤋