There is a lot of proof regarding who was behind 911 and why. It continually amazes me how people insist on ignoring the verifiable evidence in this regard. How does it make you feel?
2006-08-26 02:40:37 · 11 answers · asked by InternetPosterChild 2 in Social Science ➔ Sociology
VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE is available. The question is, hot shots, "Why are people so UNWILLING TO SEEK the truth?" So, seek it. Don't expect to get it from the Bush Administration or the bought and paid for Government funded National Networks Media. Google it. Lord knows you can't find any truth on Yahoo other than in a forum where real people are speaking. Yahoo is a part of the coverup.
2006-08-26 03:06:59 · update #1
It's funny because everyone who says "if your theory is so good/true/convincing then prove it to me" surely did not say the same thing when the government gave them an explanation. They just gobbled it right up without questioning it. Yet when people start to question what really happened, they want "proof" of something. I say that the government should give us more proof that everything went down the way they said it did, because there are just too many holes in their story.
2006-08-26 11:41:40 · answer #1 · answered by nightingale008 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Show me the "verifiable" evidence, and I'll give it some consideraton. But answer this...verified by whom? How trusted is the source? Is the person a certifiable America-hating lunatic or can his information be validated? That is the only way one can avoid hasty assumptions, jumping to conclusions and just flat out being wrong.
You must begin the be a critical thinker whenever you are presented with such an idea. Examine who would benefit if this were believed to be true (Al Queda, maybe?) whether or not it were true. Is it really plausable to think an American would purposely pull something of this magnitude and would in fact be willing to do so? If so, who would have the motive, the means and the expertise to accomplish it?
Your "proof" or "evidence" may just be valid, or it just may be a load of BS; convince me. I have an open mind.
2006-08-26 02:58:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree with you,just look at the german people in ww2,they KNEW from the smelling of burning bodies that SOMEONE(the Jews)were being burned,but didnt care to stop it,because they were hell bent on following and their satanic gov'mt,just like people do in this country.Most people in this country KNOWS are gov'mt is wrong and guilty for committing mass atrocities,but most dont want to hear it ,let alone see the proof face to face.It is a KNOWN fact,that after the US liberated the concetration camps,they MADE the german people walk thro it and see the bodies,even tho many SEEN the bodies,SOME refused to BELIEVE what they ACTUALLY SAW! Americans are no different!
2006-08-26 08:32:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
nicely, i do no longer ask questions like that so i won't have the capacity to respond to that query. you're conscious that, logically, evolution is ridiculously impossible? What i ask your self is, "Why do no longer any of those evolution followers ever clarify how interior the international a cellular 'makes a decision' to do some thing different than reflect itself wisely?" in fact, that technique is often stated as, "maximum cancers" and it KILLS the host organism. heavily, we've all kinds of frequently used "this mutated into this, which in turn mutated into this" junk floating around yet has all of us ever pronounced an organism evolving? no longer genetic decision, now, that's no longer what i'm speaking approximately. particular, if purely tall human beings get married and have toddlers, populations gets taller. yet clarify to me at what identifiable element cells initiate changing on their very own and species "develop into new species." At what element does the little legless organism's DNA ascertain, "i think of we will strengthen some nubs in the present day. waiting adult males? ok. MUTATE!" How approximately, "ask your self twin powers, activate?? form of ______ shape of ______" i'm of course no longer a scientist. yet i'm asking a severe question. practice me how this works on a cellular point and practice me the duplication effects. Then i would be keen to evaluate this "theory" as a plausible theory.
2016-12-11 15:41:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Take the evidence and join with people who believe you and hire legal advice. IF you are so sure about this, do somethign to stop it.
Moaning ot everyone who dosent believe what you do will help your cauze zero. You look like a crazy.
Snce theres "so muh evidence" then do something about it and prove all us unbelievers wrong.
Save the world
2006-08-26 04:58:23 · answer #5 · answered by kool_rock_ski_stickem 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you take this "Howard Dean level" conspiracy nonesense seriously and really believe it to be anything but an incredible "Jerry Springer type" propaganda splash by the
Far Left Wing Bleeding Heart ACLU Adoring Liberal Democrats then you are seriously naive or worse.
2006-08-26 04:20:16 · answer #6 · answered by B'klyn Barracuda 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We live in a big country with millions of people. They are people to have every kind of belief. But is discouraging so many people ignore the facts. Do you know how many people still believe that we had a good reason to attack Iraq?
2006-08-26 02:46:48 · answer #7 · answered by elgil 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
actually it's still very controversial as to who did it...who's to say that they know the truth...even if they really know the truth, are others willing to believe them ??....it's no point talking and pointing fingers now...what's done already been done....we should look forward to getting a solution for greater world peace instead of arguing who did it !!
2006-08-26 02:49:35 · answer #8 · answered by jims_bong 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't buy into wild theories drummed up by America-haters and liberals. It happened because of Al Quaida, and that's it.
2006-08-26 02:43:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Sounds like you're one of them. I'm sick of the whole mess.
2006-08-26 02:46:41 · answer #10 · answered by blondee 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋