The answer is firmly no! I have felt abused by the welfare system that rewards people for being lazy, lusty, and louts. We support them...for what purpose. Many of them are poorly educated and their children tend to mimic their parent(s) and instead of improving society, they drag it down. I realize it is difficult to draw laws to prevent it, but something must be done to curb this stupidity, not only to stop the leeches, but also for the welfare of the children. There are over 50,000 children available for adoption in the US, and many of these are handicapped physically or for prenatal alcoholism disorders or drug addiction, or even HIV. Many of them end up in foster care at further cost to us. We need to take a serious look at our society...all levels and begin to get a handle on what is acceptable. I would agree to food only...actual food...not food stamps...as the cards are used to bargain for cash to buy booze or drugs...but after the 1st illegitimate child, the woman must be on birth control...her partner should be made to have a vasectomy.
2006-08-26 02:44:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Frank 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
Uhhhh......I think it takes two to tango, aaron g!
So all those "sluts" had to have a "slut" partner to produce those bastard children. Why doesn't the male partner be a real man and live up to his responsibilities? Oh, I guess it's okay for HIM to whore around with all those "sluts" and then leave them as soon as they make a "mistake"?
I'd bet you're one of those macho misfits who really likes getting the milk for free, but doesn't want to buy the cow.
By the way, Dude....I'm not a whiny "slut" with a bunch of bastard children. I'm a 62-year-old male that just happens to think YOU ought to think twice about who you're calling a "slut". My guess is you're right down there in the cesspool with all those irresponsible girls who think sex is nothing more than a good time, casual recreation, and funky fun. Sex is a responsibility and requires the commitment and dedication of a mature adult. -RKO-
2006-08-26 02:34:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I agree with Locksmither. No government should not have to pay for the children . INstead of the goverment giving the mothers money to buy crack they should put the child in an orphanage immediately after birth or until the mother can support her baby.
I hope you are referring to both the men and women sluts!!! It's the fault of both parties. So many American women get pregnant just so they will get money from the government. It's bull sh** , and we the tax payers of the nation pay for this. It's absurd.
2006-08-26 02:32:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rachel 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
There are many points that should be considered here. If the child was deliberately conceived than both parents should pay for his/her up-bringing.
But if the man was merely having a night out what should he have to spend 15 to 18 years paying for a few minutes of pleasure.
After all, if a guy buys a ticket on a merry-go-round and has a pleasant ride, why should he have to pay when the merry-go-round breaks down a year later?
Women know, or should know, when they are ready to conceive. On those three or four days they should stay in church and not take on new tricks. Meanwhile the man has no idea when the "slut" is ready to conceive.
2006-08-31 16:43:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr.Been there 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Your prejudice, anger, and misconceptions are showing. A single parent is not a slut, their children are not bastards, and they don't all get government funding. If absent fathers would take responsibility for their children, many that do get monetary aid would not have to ask for assistance.
2006-08-26 02:34:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by oklatom 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, but why make the poor innocent child suffer.
The government should help track down the "Dad" and make him pay child support.
I have always told my sons" you make a life ,you support that child." You pay to play.
for the rest of you people, a bastard is the child of a unmarried mother.You don't want a bastard marry the father.
2006-08-26 02:55:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes, because untill there are only good parents out there to stop sluts and help, the children should never have to pay the price.
2006-08-26 02:37:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Scott B 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No the men that got the women pregnant should be made to pay,or aren't the men sluts too
2006-08-26 02:46:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Yakuza 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I didnt study a lit of your placed up yet i think of it particularly is a subculture that promotes it. no longer being racist... yet all of us understand rap is predominantly black.. The lyrics communicate approximately having intercourse with dissimilar lady, killing, and funds above something. no longer blaming rap song, yet whilst society conventional those standards than having a fatherless will become a norm somewhat of taboo. If we glance at united states of america song, we see messages of desire and love, now who listens to this song? no longer gang bangers, yet regularly efficient those with a sturdy state of ideas. in case you look at racist united states of america or racist death steel.. Who listens to that? undesirable white trash? So I dint think of it somewhat is the government that promotes it... i think of it somewhat is the messages our cultures enable and settle for that shapes who we are and what we do.. have you ever heard a rap song some loving father? Or a step dad who grew to alter right into a father he did no longer might desire to be?
2016-09-30 00:29:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by kinjorski 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you talking about the slutty fathers of these children?I'm sure with a brain like yours you abstain from sex.
2006-08-30 22:19:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by eva b 5
·
1⤊
0⤋