2006-08-26 01:50:52 · 23 answers · asked by Naazneen D 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I don't know that he'd want the post, but of course he'd be tremendously effective there too.
I also don't know that I'd agree that he was "the best President", though clearly the best in recent years.
Oh, and as you can see below, he has successfully distracted some right-wingers from participating in the real world (lol - get a life, kid! Your mania is showing).
2006-08-26 02:00:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The saddest thing about this comment is that I can not remember anything outstanding that President Clinton did during his 8 years in office. Oh accept the family leave act, and Monica Lewinski, Jennifer Flowers and on and on. Anyway, I don't agree.
2006-08-26 09:00:09 · answer #2 · answered by fire_side_2003 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. No American shoud be the president of the United Nations. Let´s not rub it in the nose of the rest of the world that we are the preeminent imperialist power at present and we can have the UN and eat it too!
2006-08-26 19:44:54 · answer #3 · answered by geaaronson 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
America has total control on UN as it is. there is no need to appoint any ex president there. Clinton was already given twice a chance to ruin whatever he can, now we can have some other person to ruin our world.
2006-08-26 08:59:37 · answer #4 · answered by mukesh padhya 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he was an excellent president and leaders around the world respected him. Much more then the neo-cons that set him up to discredit him. What goes on behind closed doors should not matter to anybody but those that are personally involved.
2006-08-26 09:18:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
A lot of vociferous, uninformed Republicans posting. But, yes, not even they can dispute his intelligence, and he is well respected throughout most parts of the world. Probably a GOP controlled US, would be the only country to veto the idea.
2006-08-26 09:16:39 · answer #6 · answered by ElOsoBravo 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Putting a question mark after a statement doesn't make it a question, but I wouldn't call Clinton the worst president. I would put him somewhere in the lower half.
2006-08-26 08:55:03 · answer #7 · answered by rhymingron 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The middleeast became a huge problem during the Clinton administration because he ignored it.
Don't think he would make a very good SGUN
2006-08-26 08:53:02 · answer #8 · answered by Cattlemanbob 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Good answer donnagary, there is nothing I can add except Clinton was great at all affairs both foreign and domestic. Unfortuanetly they were with women and didn't deal with world problems.
2006-08-26 09:10:19 · answer #9 · answered by mk_matson 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
don't we have enough corruption in the UN as it is? Foreign affairs was not Clinton's strong point. Not that he ever had a strong point when it came to this country.
2006-08-26 08:54:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋