I dont know what it is, TNA is so much better, they are all probably sheep and do not know what to like without it being told to them.
2006-08-28 15:28:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by xthority 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
WWE got more history and better superstars,more extreme speciality matches like hell in a cell,elimination chamber and many more.TNA does have some good superstars like aj styles,christopher daniels,samoa joe.........and most of their wrestlers are from WWE.Christian Cage sucks in the WWE,then suddenly he becomes the NWA champion.Why the hell must TNA ''push" Christian Cage?TNA speciality matches are lame like King of The Mountain.Ultimate X isn't that bad but can't compete with WWE's hell in a cell.Finally,Vince Mcmahon is so much smarter than that idiot who runs TNA.
2006-08-26 01:29:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by WWE Champ 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think TNa SHOULd push the younger guys... personaly I rather see aj styles and Chris Daniels vs LAX for the tag belts... then vinnie mac be "broken down" anyday....
To me the problem is that I dont know if TNa is the alternative to WWE or if Tna is WWE, jr. The younger guys should be being pushed.... guys like samoa joe... Styles... Daniels and even sonjay dutt(why not?)
Thats my problem TNa doesnt know what it is yet.... By the way... the faters they get rid of Jeff Jarett and give the title to Samoa joe... the better... I swear if he ends like monty brown... Im gonna choke somebody out...
Give TNA time....
2006-08-26 00:56:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by javmankid87 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
im a HUGE wwe fan and i watch tna most of the time i see it on. i like both
i do like wwe better because its easier on the eyes(not the wrestlers) tna always seems so dark and the paperview adverts i could do on microsoft slideshow
PS love tna ring
christian cage and ajstyles rock
2006-08-26 02:37:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
TNA wrestles differenty i never heard of TNA i just heard of it last month and i watched it last thursday and i really dont like it they wrestle diffrently and WWE is like a soap opera with wrestling
2006-08-26 01:56:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rated R Diva ♥ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
because of the history of wwe. look at all the history and GREAT MATCHES and storylines they had. it's great!!!! great matches. hell, buried,chamber, etc.....the wwe was once great now it sucks.
that company is worth billions. that proves that the wwe is the best. mcmahon small looking private jet is worth 30 mill. 30 mil!
he's got something. they've been all around the world. where has tna gone? did they entertain the troops 2 times? no.
wwe has. ITS THE HISTORY OF WWE. THE ATTITUDE ERA.
THAT WAS ONE OF THE BEST. I LOVED WWE BEFORE.
NOW IT SUCKS. THE STORYLINES, SUCKS.
TNA STILL SUCKS TOO. I WATCHED IT AND IT SUCKS.
i didn't even bother watching the whole show.
2006-08-26 05:09:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dunno i think TNA is much better the people there are more athletic and fun to watch plu it has icons like sting, tna has everything in my opinion the rivalries are fantastic and recently wwe has just started to bore me, especially smackdown, wwe has more better matches such as hell in a cell and the elimination chamber but tna pay PPV'S are more fun to watch like lethal lockdown 6 sides of steel was amazing and destination x with the x division title on the line
2006-08-26 02:32:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dan B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's mostly people who didn't make it in WCW or WWE. I also can't stand Jeff Jarrett. Like Christian, he couldn't really hack it in WWE (or WCW) when the main guys were there, but now he's the be all/end all of wrestling?
2006-08-26 02:20:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by sdmf4u2000 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
imho (and i haven't been a serious wrestling fan in years), wrestling is about testosterone and competition. when there's two competing shows, there's endless discussion about which is better.
2006-08-26 00:33:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋