recent study have made us to think about our ancestors rooting , are their any race which matches the primates of our ancestors in africa whats dna similarity which makes so closer to original ancestors, a discontinuous evolution or the restricted bloodline.
2006-08-25 23:46:23 · 11 answers · asked by andy 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Zoology
If you learned how to use punctuation your question would be much more comprehensible. If you use capitals, periods and spaces between words you are much more likely to attract informed answers. With the single run-on sentence you produced above you will just get responses like the garbage ck vamsi just posted.
As far as i can decipher your question:
1) The vast majority of scientists now accept that humans all originated from one small group of people who lived in sub-Saharan Africa about 60 - 100, 000 years ago. It doesn't matter whether a person comes form Idaho, India or Ireland, their recent ancestors were African and only African. This theory has been well supported by genetic evidence. There is a lot of evidence that all humans share a very recent common ancestor and none whatsoever for substantial genetic differences between geographic locations or races.
There is a small minority of scientists who believe that that original African populations hybridised with human or pre-human population in various parts of the world, but they have little in the way of evidence to support their belief.
Probably less than 50 scientists worldwide still believe modern humans are the result of independent evolutionary lineages from pre-human ancestors. That view was fairly prevalent until 50 years ago, but has dwindled fast since then.
2) There are no significant genetic differences between races. There is greater genetic variation within races than between them. An Irishman is most genetically closer to a Zulu than to a Frenchman. A Japanese is probably genetically more similar to an Aborigine than to a Chinese.
So no, of course no race has DNA that is closer to any ancestor. All humans came from a small group of fully human ancestors very recently and as such no human group is genetically more primitive than any other.
3) I have no idea what you mean by "a discontinuous evolution or the restricted bloodline". Maybe if you use punctuation..?
2006-08-25 23:53:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Your question is not very clear (you have to sharpen up your punctuation). Homo sapiens (that is you) originate in Africa. There have been humans of different types that have coexisted with human sapiens, like neanderthalensis and floresiens, but have disappeared. All humans today, with no exception have the same DNA base, independently of who they look like externally. There is only one species and not more. The word race is not used in this context. Look at the WIki link that I have as source. There you will find further links to the ohter human varieties that have disappeared.
2006-08-25 23:56:06 · answer #2 · answered by regis_cabral 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Generally, if the environment is large enough, several distincted bloodlines are developed. It's not confirmed that people have several different bloodlines, the earth is most probably not big enough to develop man like life on totally different occasions. (Higher forms of specialisms, like hearing, feeling, sight (all in general): probably DO have multiple different evolutionary lines). So, all people are related.
If you go back far enough, probably ALL life on earth is totally related to each other.
Racists are really dumb; if they go back in their very own family, they'll find all sorts of skin colors, from white to black and all in between. Racists typically dislike science. Racism is just as dumb as astrology regarding type of character and prediction capability.
2006-08-25 23:53:45 · answer #3 · answered by · 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Maybe you should learn to punctuate before you ask questions about our ancestors.
2006-08-26 04:43:42 · answer #4 · answered by That one guy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not really sure what your question is. But all humans have the same ancestors (homo sapiens) and all humans are equally close (genetically speaking) to them.
2006-08-25 23:57:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
we all are of african descent, even europeans, north and south americans. i saw it in PBS how they traced the genes of every human race to a single parent in africa. no kidding. we are talking about apes of course.
2006-08-25 23:58:43 · answer #6 · answered by Shangri-La 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Asians originate from a different species the mongolian and INdus valley men are to be the originators
2006-08-25 23:53:17 · answer #7 · answered by Munna Bhai 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
becouse most of the asian and african are black skin and this is connection of genes b\w genes .
2006-08-26 03:18:14 · answer #8 · answered by shahrukh 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's hope your DNA doesn't reproduce.
2006-08-26 03:15:57 · answer #9 · answered by stevewbcanada 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are a human being.Be satisfied with that
2006-08-26 00:01:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋