1> Gilchrist hasn't been included in the side for sep's tri-series (mlsia), can it be a +ve point for india?
2> who among these should b selected? [for tri-series]
a> munaf ptl b> vrv singh c> pedro collins (wi) d> bracken (aus)
other qts:
3> who should open for pak in their 1st odi on aug 30th in cardiff?
4> what can you say about eng's squad & line-up agaist pak/?
2006-08-25 22:30:31 · 18 answers · asked by DPC 5 in Sports ➔ Cricket
1.I don't know but if its true there is a huge damage in the Australian side coz' Gilchrist is the best wicket-keeper and a brilliant opener.
2.VRV Singh and Nathan Bracken
3.Shoaib Malik and Imran Farhat.
4.England have picked the right youngsters like Broad he is a brilliant bowler.He will play for England in the next 10 years.
2006-08-26 03:07:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gilchrist has only been left out as Australia have a punishing schedule coming up with tri-series in Malaysia, Champions Trophy, Ashes, VB series(vs Eng & NZ), 3 ODI in NZ, World Cup in West Indies, then straight to Zimbabwe, and only 1 month off before the 20 20 world cup in September. He's not getting younger, so they will let him miss the friendly tournaments. Don't worry, Haddin will still have a go even if he isn't Gilchrist. He has a ODI strike rate of 71.94....
2006-08-27 03:39:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1)yes india is having a very good chance because there main opener adam gilchrist is out of the squad and the australians r in trouble because there is no keeper in australia to take the place of gilchrist
2)i think so nathan bracken should be selected for australians because the australians r in serious trouble because they have lost there main player gilchrist and if bracken will be in a team then there will be having a chance
and munaf should be selected for india because india need a very good partner and paceman to give help of irfan
3)shahid afridi and imran farhat should open the innings against england because if afridi is there then the target for pakistan will be easy because of his strike rate.and if he opens the innings and then if he hit some shots then the pakistan will reach the target very easily
4)england squad r in trouble because of the absence of the some important players
1)micheal vaughan
2)flintoff
3)giles
4)simon jones
if these players r back in the team and then england will not get much trouble to chase a target or to smash a very great target that no team could reach it and the line ups against pakistan would be waste of seeing because the englands r different in tests and odis then there would be a great task for pakistanis to beat them?><
2006-08-30 06:28:59 · answer #3 · answered by LITTLEZIZOU 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1. Not @ all...As long as R. Ponting, Symond, Bret & Bracken in the team
2. Munaf & Bracken
3. Salman & Younis or Afridi & Younis (Let them try something new as india does)
4. I guess ODI against Pak is not going to be the same as Test therefore Pak is most likely to win the ODI team of England which is #8 in the ODI ranking table..Not good enough
2006-08-26 03:34:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
commonly used , speaking about previous years, (international Cup smart) Germany, France is too inconsistent. For ex. France received the W.C in 1998 2002, out by using the first round, i imagine they did not even score a purpose. 2006, Runners up, in simple terms to lose by using consequences 2009 WC skills, struggled ! Germany, continually has a reserved spot in both 4, 3, or second position. they have received the international Cup 3 situations (i'm quite sensible it changed into 3) in the initiating of each international Cup or any tournament at that be counted, they initiate to construct up, and improve more advantageous. They in no way instruct weak spot. they in basic terms are staggering even as it includes vast tournaments.
2016-11-27 22:21:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
gilchrist hasnot included in the side for sep's tri-series its be +ve point for india because gilchrist make run very fast
munaf ptl should be selected for tri series
match is draw
good
2006-08-30 21:07:22 · answer #6 · answered by cool guy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes ithink that australia is in serious trouble because they lost their main player adam gilchrist and their chancesof winning that tri nation cup is also decreasing
2)munaf patel should be selected because munaf should be with pathan and then only they can keep pressure on the other team
3)shoib malik and salman butt r the good openers for pakistan because they both r in very good form and they can acheive target and they both players have very much confident
4)i think so england will lose
2006-08-30 14:00:06 · answer #7 · answered by Xclusive 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1> India has always beaten Australia in the previous editions of Champions trophy where Gilli played. So whether Gilli is there or not, it is immaterial. He had not much success in India. remeber his King's pair in the memeorable Kolkata test.
2>Are you selecting a World XI? None of them will make it toa World XI. However all will make to their country's eleven.
3> It is Hafiz and Akmal. Then Malik and Afridi.
4> Pakistan is like injured tiger. England will lost the series immaterial of whom they play.
2006-08-28 19:45:08 · answer #8 · answered by rups 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pls follow the points
1>Yes it is because India is having Dhoni with them.
2> Munaf Patel
3>Salmaan Butt and Imran Farhat
4>They will be a balance sides and a tough compositions.
2006-08-25 23:02:27 · answer #9 · answered by Kunal 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
1. it is been positive point for india .yes india is having a good chance bcz Sachin,Yuvraj,Dhoni, Is in good form ............
2. Munaf patel bcz aus has lee who is fastest in aus so india should have munaf fastest of indian bowler.
3. Younis And Youhana.
4. i can tell England is a very good team at present without few main player but it has lot of chances to win............
2006-08-25 23:10:00 · answer #10 · answered by great.sunil 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋