English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does NOT warn you of the constant course and rude language, gay sex scene (in the first half hour!! They were obviously too lonely looking after the sheep in the mountains by themselves for 2 months and couldn't handle they're impulses of doing each other up the ****! I wonder how they did it without doing it, if you know what I mean! Jake is really gay, but then they both get REALLY horny!), nudity (of Anne Hathaway! From 'Princess Diaries' 1 & 2, 'Ella Enchanted' and 'Hoodwinked'!-she's going all porno! I didn't know you could actually see her boobs bounce out of her bra for yourself! and Michelle Williams, too! How could Heath not mind his wife doing that?! and Jake and Heath's bums when they are washing themselves with the river water, and also some times when you see they're cracks out of their pants! I hope they're front parts were covered!), the animal violence/gore (you can see a dead sheep's insides-eaten up by a coyote/wolf obviously when they were *******!

2006-08-25 21:54:45 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Movies

(I wonder if it was an actual real sheep! And if so, if they did it to the sheep on purpose just for the movie, or they had already had the carcass! Too mean if it was the first one!)
The beginning of it is nice and tranquil with good scenery (the director did win lots of awards!) and calm and easy to watch- well, before the drama kicks in and the slowness of the movie isn't there anymore!
But the sex scenes were pretty well done anyway, with not showing anything! (except for the bum and boobs!)
I also recognized Linda Cardellini and Anna Faris, which was very good of me, since they were very well disguised and looked WAY different and done form the other movies they are in and famous for! ('Scary Movie,' 'Hot Chick' and 'Scooby-Doo.')

2006-08-25 21:55:21 · update #1

It didn't dirtusb me much, more interested me.
It seems to match more MA or R movies to others that are rated M (or American PG-13).
I am just thinking for people who watched it and didn't have any warning, and can get offended.

2006-08-25 22:11:58 · update #2

13 answers

you mean bareback mountain?!

2006-08-25 21:56:11 · answer #1 · answered by claire 5 · 2 2

What are you talking about?
The MPAA rating is R and they always list what they base the rating on. For example, if you are looking at the DVD case, it lists: sexuality, nudity, language and some violence. Basically everything that "concerns you" about the movie.
I don't know where you got that it was rated "M".
Perhaps if these images disturb you this much you should do more research on them before watching them. There's loads of info on the web.
I, myself, cannot take too much graphic violence so I just stay away from those altogether.
But I think you pretty much knew what was going to happen in this movie before you even saw it, right? I mean, there was ALL sorts of hype way before it was released, while it was in theaters, during the Oscar season...
Also, the DVD includes lots of behind the scenes footage if you're really worried about the sheep...or people's bums!

2006-08-25 22:34:10 · answer #2 · answered by mamabunny 4 · 1 0

I think it's one of the worst movies ever, how can these sick producers/actors make something so hideous?
The message that it sends to society, children and young audiences.

I think it's more than disgusting, I refuse to give my money to anything so sick, this movie leaves a lot to be desired, I find it plain distasteful, gross and crooked, demented, depraved people!
I will never see it, nor waste money or time on something like that!

2006-09-02 20:31:54 · answer #3 · answered by You are loved 5 · 1 0

i haven't seen the movie and don't think i want to see it. i didn't like the commercials when it came on t.v. and i just don't i want to see all those gay scenes. it just doesn't interest me.

2006-09-02 19:04:02 · answer #4 · answered by ro gulley rat 2 · 1 0

"M" does represent mature, right? Geez, it's just a movie! Personally, I thought it was pretty good; great scenery, great acting. It was acting, right?

2006-09-02 15:34:58 · answer #5 · answered by mawmaw 1 · 0 1

should've been rated PG-13... showed as much as Titanic

2006-08-25 22:28:03 · answer #6 · answered by Super Kevin 2 · 0 1

I think you knew what to expect before you watched it. I don't know why you watched it if such adult things disturb you so.

2006-08-25 22:02:09 · answer #7 · answered by nolongeravailableatY!Answers 3 · 1 1

thats one movie they sure arent going to make a video game out of...

2006-08-25 22:00:21 · answer #8 · answered by R-Diz 4 · 2 1

Take the stick out of your butt

2006-08-25 23:27:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

yes

2006-09-02 12:04:50 · answer #10 · answered by alex_parrotgirl 1 · 0 1

It should be rated G.

2006-08-25 22:20:53 · answer #11 · answered by TheFatIdiot 3 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers