what is ur idea reg darrel hair decision in umpiring ,whether is right or wrong any body can write to me .?

Answer 1

i think his decision was wrong because he didnt informed inzamam & called for another ball . he even didnt tell him that ball was tempered or something else was done with the ball. instead of it he even offered english batsmen to choose the ball.

what inzy did there was quite right. to protest against such bias umpires was to be done & he did it.

Answer 2

The scene was the ugliest of the cricket histrory. It was like some children were playing cricket and one bully was trying to get his way.

Inzy, and the team ofcourse, should not have protested, in the way they did, in the middle of the match. This was indeed against the law, and I would say spirits as well, of the game. They could have done it in a better way. So, as per the rule, they did wrong, thus reprimanded. You can't question Hair, other umpire, or for that matter ICC for the forfeiture.

Hair 'Raiser' in my opinion is a bully. I would say he has got some qualities of Hitler. He, too, wants importance and doesn't like standing in the ground mere as an umpire. He has a dubious track record and was once expelled from the elite panel. Pakistan did ask ICC, before the series, for not to stand him as an umpire in the series. They have complained many times earlier against the umpire; and this could the revenge of him for those complaints.

The game could have carried on, even after Pakistan delayed their appearance, had it not been the EGO of the 'so called' firm Hair 'Raiser'. He just denied to come on the field if Pakistan takes the field, as if Pakistanis have killed some of his close ones. Come on man - it was a game and you are just an official and not a active participant.

When it comes to Pakistan then they, too, a very bad track record for ball tampering. Recently Afridi even gave a statement about the issue an interview, in which he said - no game can be won without tampering and ICC should allow some level of tampering. In all earlier cases, though, umpires used to have some sort of proof, but here they have none. And that's their fault.

I would say that the match should be declared as abondoned. Hair's performance should be reviewed critically and, if required, should be removed from the elite panel. Lets enjoy the cricket and not the drama by one or two stupid person.

Answer 3

Inzy were given cleared because ICC is a coward body, very afraid to face the hue and cry. The 4 adventure ban became for "taking the game to disrepute" by technique of forfeiting the adventure, as if otherwise they were a sparkling lot. that's a body finished of hypocrites. So Hair had to be a scape-goat. not that it concerns. he's not a push over. he's a radical professional and is widely used with that he's properly. If he's requested to quit for incorrect motives, ICC has to cough up the fee requested by technique of him. So he continues to be, not for the champions trophy notwithstanding. Its a political sport infant---no more effective gents are in contact!

Answer 4

I think he took a firm decision.But Pakistan shouldn't have forfeited the match it is an insult to cricket game itself.It is just a matter of 5 runs for this they maka a big fuss.Did u see ndtv yesterday in that they showed that a same thing happened in 1997 by SAfrica and that time Bob woolmer was their coach.They asked whether it has any connection with this issue.Wat Do U think.

Answer 5

Hair,s decision was a bad one. Just because a ball reverse swings too much, one cannot conclude that it has been tampered with. Then why did no one raise the same question when Simon Jones of England stunned the Aussies with his reverse swing in the Ashes2005??????

Answer 6

Its a better decision from the part of the umpire.

Answer 7

I think the decision was a bit too harsh and abrupt. He could have warned the captain. I don't know anything about the racist element in his decision. All I understand is it was all too hasty.

Answer 8

I THINK HE MADE A WRONG DECISION
HOW IN THE FU CK CAN HE SAY THAT THE BALL IS TAMPERED. DOES HE HAVE ANY PROOF.
IT WOULD BETTER IF PAKIS HAVE COMPLETED THE MATCH
AND THEN HAVE THE DISCUSION

Answer 9

how dare can u people start a discussion on my son without my prior permission???!!!

Answer 10

darrel was right.