...fund another mission to the Moon, or to Mars, or neither?
2006-08-25 20:19:43 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Neither. They should examine near earth objects, potential energy sources from space, and deep space probes. Much more to learn, and much more benefit.
2006-08-25 20:53:29 · answer #1 · answered by freebird 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why go to the moon? we have gone to the moon several times. The japanese are going to make a moon base eventually. The station is suppose to be a future launching spot to go to the mars. To get out of orbit it takes a lot of fuel and by launching from a space station it will take less fuel. The only problem is that Mars is so far away for a human to get to right now. As technology gets better we will get to Mars.
2006-08-26 03:28:36 · answer #2 · answered by KrazyK784 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes They should fund more missions to mars and moon because one or two missions can't study the whole surface.
2006-08-26 03:29:45 · answer #3 · answered by Astronomy Freak 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are funding another mission to the moon. I think that one more could help us understand the surface of the moon because now we have more technology to explore. The first moon landings had to focus on navigation and survival more than it would be necessary to focus on such things today. More time can be spent testing.
2006-08-26 03:33:17 · answer #4 · answered by trueblue88 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
by 2018 they r going to send up manned space missions every month to the moon. ppl will stay at 6 month intervals and establish a space base. and they r going to make the launch site near the south pole where the air is pretty thin. i learned this at cape canaveral 2 weeks ago.
2006-08-26 03:27:25 · answer #5 · answered by Worldemperor 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are talking about manned missions, my answer is no. We can explore more efficiently with rovers, probes and satellites. Sending people to distant worlds only exposes them to deadly cosmic rays.
We should continue to explore other worlds with whatever means necessary to find out more about these worlds before we send human settlers..
2006-08-26 03:31:45 · answer #6 · answered by Tim C 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they are just wasting the hard earned money. They should stop vilating nature and must start a project on how to save earth from natural disasters.
2006-08-26 03:27:37 · answer #7 · answered by Aashish 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i know they will more inlikly i mean they say that after decades and e ons that there are 9 planets all of a sudden they cnat figure out if there are 6 or 36 plants... see son thats why sci can be bad, it sqrews up everything
2006-08-26 03:26:37 · answer #8 · answered by Kydolf Bootler 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
honestly, I think they should stop for awhile and use all that money private or public and help the people on Earth, like find a better fuel source for cars, etc...
2006-08-26 03:25:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp - or what's a heaven for?" Robert Browning.
2006-08-26 07:56:35 · answer #10 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋