2006-08-25 20:09:05 · 7 answers · asked by barbaradjt 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No one country can run the UN. That would mean that one country has control over all others.
Although the US is powerful, they haven't reached the level of world-control force yet.
I think that's Bush's wet dream, however.
2006-08-25 20:17:36 · answer #1 · answered by RatherTallFella 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's have the UN get the hell OUT of the US and go to some shithole third world country. Then let's see how well that country is about "diplomatic immunity" and other bullshit that protects criminal activity.
2006-08-25 20:13:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Peace and Justice throughout the world.
2006-08-25 20:13:36 · answer #3 · answered by Sydney 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It isn't being run by the USA now? hmm....were already the world police...
2006-08-25 20:56:01 · answer #4 · answered by JAG 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is run by the USA cause it gets its money from them.
2006-08-25 20:18:35 · answer #5 · answered by Egroeg_Rorepme 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A huge cash bonanza for the US, crapola for every other country on the planet.
2006-08-25 20:10:14 · answer #6 · answered by suzanne 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
then why should the other 193 countries exist....why not make it a huge gigantic USA....
2006-08-25 20:15:03 · answer #7 · answered by aneurinaa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋