2006-08-25 19:29:54 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Anthropology
Define what you mean by "reality".
There are several movies named "King Kong".
There were props made for at least the first two; those props are "real" (though not living apes).
There could be no real ape as big as King Kong; bone and muscle are not strong enough to support anything as tall and skinny (relatively) as an ape at that physical size.
(FYI: This isn't an anthropology question. Anthropology has to do with people, not apes - even great apes.)
2006-08-25 19:38:01 · answer #1 · answered by Engineer-Poet 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hardly . . . the "ape" used for King Kong wsn't even terribly realistic. Gorillas are ground-dwellers, not tree-dwellers, so the likelihood of any size gorilla being able to climb a building is minimal.
And I'd like to correct the individual who stated anthropology is only about people, not about apes. Primateologists (the folks who study apes, monkeys, prosimians, etc.) usually major in physical anthropology.
2006-08-29 12:49:26 · answer #2 · answered by Tammy B 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you are in the wrong area...But no there was never a king kong ...psss..it was made up by hollywood to get azzes in the seats hehe
2006-08-26 02:39:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, and once I was eaten by a giant T-Rex!!!! LOL!! Dude u sound like a freaking baby. No it is not real, it was made by a computer to entertain!!! Seriously. Ur q is funny!!!
2006-08-26 14:49:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seriously, no. It's just a movie character.
2006-08-26 04:36:03 · answer #5 · answered by MrZ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't prove a negative, but not likely at all.
2006-08-27 03:02:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes and also a godzilla
2006-08-26 02:32:17 · answer #7 · answered by Jorge L 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its not true.Fantasia.
2006-08-26 17:16:17 · answer #8 · answered by Atila a 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wat?
2006-08-26 02:32:40 · answer #9 · answered by TiggaTheTiger 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋