K=C, S=C, X is waste, W too can be replaced
2006-08-25 18:52:09 · 7 answers · asked by darkman_in 2 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
well u should kno dat the guys who made the alphabets got their own reasons they obviously were proper englishmen so y argue with them real its a waste of time thinkin of somthin like that!!...jus deal with it!!!sorry!
2006-08-25 19:10:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would make no sense. Slide would be clide, which could be prounounced slide I guess, but SHOULD be pronounced like Clyde. W cannot be replaced either, how would we replace the w in water? We? Whistle? C would have way too many uses, and it would make the English language even more confusing and f*cked up. But I do agree, X is a waste. We can just replace it with Z, because that's what X's are always pronounced as anyways.
2006-08-25 19:09:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather get rid of the C, and use the K for all the hard Cs and the S for all soft Cs. Ex words like exit would be longer because we'd have to use a combo of the K and the S to get the same sound, ala eksit. The same goes for the W. We'd have to use Hs and Us in combo to replace many Ws, ala huater. In fact, I think we should add some letters, so we don't have to use two letters for the TH and CH sounds.
2006-08-25 21:01:25 · answer #3 · answered by Rico Toasterman JPA 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They cant be replaced! If they were it would be very confusing ( at first) then the other letters would just be like the same thing! So it woulnt be a very good idea.... atleast for me.....
2006-08-25 19:00:23 · answer #4 · answered by Animal _lover783 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well...sex would be "ce". Sounds a little confusing to me.
2006-08-26 03:50:39 · answer #5 · answered by Canadian Ken 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't eX actly Know Why,for Sure.
2006-08-27 04:03:02 · answer #6 · answered by rhymer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
huh?
2006-08-26 03:21:08 · answer #7 · answered by robyn 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋