English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Some seem to think your kid will grow up to indulge in one of the few ways to get HIV AIDS. For the small % which get it, its unfair that most people get to live without AIDS. So to be fair, and safe... Should ALL children be forced to be injected with HIV vaccine? (made from hiv)

Hopefully a few generations later, HIV will be hardcoded into human DNA world wide.

2006-08-25 17:38:09 · 12 answers · asked by kool_rock_ski_stickem 4 in Politics & Government Politics

So, you would allow "dead HIV cells" inside your child?

2006-08-25 17:46:46 · update #1

Do you feel threatened by HIV? Think your capable of getting it from the risks you take? The morons with terd answers who got thumbs down allready have HIV from rectum related injection methods.

2006-08-25 17:48:04 · update #2

It is a serious question. Because it is serious consideration. There are powerful people who want to fund a AIDS vaccine. Vaccines contain what they are suposed to stop.

And fact is there ARE mandatory vaccines.

2006-08-25 17:50:00 · update #3

"HIV vaccine? It does not exist (yet), and if it did, injecting people with it would not give them AIDS. (Its a vaccine.) " Right, it will give them HIV cells.

And yes. Adding things to the body can effect DNA. When reproductive cells are made, they are effected by all chemicals in your body, and would carry on the traces of HIV. After a few generations, HIV would be hardcoded.

2006-08-25 17:52:18 · update #4

12 answers

I think DR Jonas Salk, And DR Thomas Francis would Have Turned Over. Mandatory, has a Ring of DR Josef Mengele to it.

2006-08-26 05:59:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You do spend time reading the present education on vaccinations, do not you? Or do you purely enroll in the "fearmonger's keep"? i'm not making use of this to placed you down, yet comprehend that internet internet sites are literally not dated. education you're reading may be 10-15 years old and thoroughly old style. The preservative utilized in individual vaccines is not utilized in baby's vaccines, operating example. if you're worried, evaluate an altered agenda which calls for purely one injection for a visit. you ought to do more effective visits, notwithstanding it may well be a lot less complicated to cope with. exciting be conscious: I basically those days got here across out that individual circumstances of continual colitis (an infection of the intestines) may be led to by technique of rotovirus (a formative years diarrhea ailment for which there is now a vaccine). it ought to also be led to by technique of norovirus. Now, I had norovirus more effective than a month in the past and it nevertheless is causing complications for my intestines. I now help that vaccine besides now that I comprehend the destiny subject matters that can happen to a pair.

2016-10-15 21:35:31 · answer #2 · answered by hafner 4 · 0 0

Almost all kids WILL grow up to indulge in one (or more) of the few ways to get "HIV AIDS" (which is two different things).

Its unfair that most get to live without it? What?

HIV will be hardcoded into human DNA? What?

HIV vaccine? It does not exist (yet), and if it did, injecting people with it would not give them AIDS. (Its a vaccine.) This would seemingly make it even more unfair to you since these kids could do whatever they wanted and with whoever they wanted without risk of getting the disease.

2006-08-25 17:49:14 · answer #3 · answered by Jim S 5 · 0 2

Hmm, the murder of children for the sake of safety... is that supposed to make sense?
Also, vaccines don't work that way. The only thing that injecting a live virus into everyone would insure a few generations later is that there would not be many people left.
Please, tell me this is not a serious question. If it is serious, please get a clue.

2006-08-25 17:46:35 · answer #4 · answered by sverthfreyr 3 · 3 0

MOST of the vaccines are made now a days from dead cells. I DOUBT seriously they would put a live virus in people.FURTHER more they may just have a vaccine 4 HIV in the future. THEy are talking about it now.

2006-08-25 17:44:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

checkout some early microbiologists - learn something. Very unethical! It worked for small pox - but that was afluke. your are a sic individual and I'm glad that one day (hopefully soon but not soon enough) you will die of AIDS and suffer a painful death, you flamer - you must have goten your avitar name after thinking about the homo Rock Hudson. You also remind me of that flame Liberache. I know that you'll be buried backside up.

2006-08-25 17:47:29 · answer #6 · answered by SweetNurse 4 · 1 3

I really don't think they should do that . They don't even want to support stem cell research.

2006-08-25 17:46:57 · answer #7 · answered by ₦âħí»€G 6 · 2 0

Hopefully, you're just being sarcastic?

2006-08-25 17:44:54 · answer #8 · answered by mel 4 · 1 0

Don't feed the troll people.

2006-08-25 17:44:03 · answer #9 · answered by chemicalimbalance000 4 · 5 1

hell no, then everyone would have AIDS

2006-08-25 17:43:31 · answer #10 · answered by madchiman 3 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers