English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I believe Bush is doing the right thing- I back him 100%.

2006-08-25 17:15:44 · 14 answers · asked by (NO) NAME 5 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

14 answers

Yes, I do! The problem is that people want instant results. Remember folks...you have a right to vote for the Bush of your choice. Go Jeb! LOL

2006-08-25 17:23:09 · answer #1 · answered by da dude 4 · 2 1

No. I don not think the war will have a positive outcome. There are too many Iraqi casualties. The Iraqi people are not better off than they were before Saddam was overthrown. We are not safer because we are fighting the terrorists there. We hit the hornet's nest with a giant stick, and we'd better prepare ourselves to be stung for a long time to come.

2006-08-26 00:26:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Boo! No war! Peace! Peace, I say! No war has a positive outcome. Someone always loses! We need to protect ourselves and let others protect themselves as well, because I guarantee you if we are ever attacked by one of the nukes these so-called nuke free countries have, our so-called 'friends' will not lift a finger to help us because of fear they will be next! I say use our troops to line the borders of the United States and then see who messes with us! No war in Iraq! No more Bush's in the White House!

2006-08-26 00:19:39 · answer #3 · answered by The Nana of Nana's 7 · 2 1

hmmmm

yeah, this is one of those things where the history books will tell he did the right thing. The liberal media is full of ****. People are so stupid that they think, because a man isn't the best orator that he is unintelligent. He is a good person and has the ability to lead. They, however, do not. But it will probably fail because the next president will be an impatient liberal idiot.

2006-08-26 00:20:44 · answer #4 · answered by Joe 5 · 1 2

Nope--see Vietnam.

2006-08-26 01:11:37 · answer #5 · answered by wildstar_2 6 · 1 1

yes it is very instromental in finding bin laudin and ending terrorism. isnt that why were there? isnt that the reason that we had to go into iraq to find bin laudin who never even enterd iraq? or is it cause of bush sr.s promise that he made to the citezans of iraq that he did not keep and cost them many. or in the simpelest terms is it somebodies intrest in oil...black gold texas tea?

2006-08-26 00:21:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yes. I agree with you. We need to be strong on national security, but try getting democrats to believe that.

2006-08-26 00:42:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

bush sucks. really bad. he needs to be stopped before he runs all of us straight into the ground, i dont back him at all on anything.

2006-08-26 00:19:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

No I don't. I think it's a waste of time that is taking a lot of innocent lives.

2006-08-26 00:21:37 · answer #9 · answered by Nico 7 · 1 1

I hope so. I also back him 100% I don't see that he had any other choice.

2006-08-26 00:21:03 · answer #10 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers