English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If the moon was painted silver it would shine brighter therefore giving us more daylight per annum. But how many tins of B&Q value emulsion would it take??

2006-08-25 17:04:19 · 24 answers · asked by Muppet_Planet 2 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

24 answers

Try contacting the Lunar Painting Company Ltd. They've been painting the moon for some years now. It's like painting the Forth Bridge - once you finish, you go back and start again.

You could also suggest your painting it silver idea instead of the traditional moon grey.

2006-08-25 17:22:40 · answer #1 · answered by klystronic 1 · 0 0

Well, first of all, this won't give us any more daylight hours, it will merely make the night time a little less dark. Also, it will be completely useless on a new moon.

If, however, you did manage to turn night into day, you'd screw up the solar cycles of every plant and animal living under the sun, not to mention raise the Earth's temperature significantly (if you think global warming is a joke, this will be the real thing), causing major disaster.

But even if you knew the surface area of the moon to be 3.793x10^7 km^2, and the coverage of 4 litres of paint to be 40 m^2, then calculate the paint you'd need to be about 950 000 litres, and actually had the means to do this, it wouldn't even have that much effect, nor be a good way to spend your time.

I don't imagine it'd be easy to get the paint to dry in an environment without an atmosphere, either.

Hope this helps.

2006-08-25 17:18:34 · answer #2 · answered by CubicMoo 2 · 0 0

Tricky that. If you use the formula for calculating the area of a globe and apply it to the diameter of the moon, then divide by two as we only ever see one side of the moon, you will then have the area to be covered.
Then calculate how many square metres (yards) are in a square mile
Multiply this by the area of half of the moon and that will give you the number of square metres (yards) then divide this by the coverage quoted on the B & Q tin in square metres (yards) and I think that will give you the answer.
Just think of the confusion for wildlife as the daylight hours would fluctuate wildly as the moon waxed and waned every four weeks.

Wouldn't it be easier just to turn the lights on?

2006-08-25 20:19:53 · answer #3 · answered by Zebidee 2 · 0 0

Painting the moon would not effect the number of daylight hours, Hours of daylight are determined by rotation of earth and it orbit around the sun i.e. the poles having significantly longer or shorter hours than the equator.

2006-08-25 17:21:24 · answer #4 · answered by lobo 4 · 0 0

Ooook. Yes, it would make the world a brighter place, since the moon's surface is about as bright as asphalt. (It doesn't look it from down here, but it is.)

And you'd only have to paint half of it! But, wow, that's a lot of paint. I wonder how many tons of pollution and greenhouse gases woudl be produced simply getting the paint up there?

2006-08-25 17:11:46 · answer #5 · answered by Jim S 5 · 0 0

I won't complication talking approximately it, so i will quote the undesirable Astonomer stunning here. "rapid: what's the 2nd brightest organic merchandise interior the sky? The brightest is obviously the solar. the 2nd brightest is the Moon. The Moon is so bright that it casts clean shadows at night, you could study by using it, or perhaps by using a modest telescope it could make your eyes water. So why do various human beings think of you could no longer see it in the time of the day? possibly they think of it particularly is washed out by using the solar. it somewhat is not any longer; if it somewhat is up and extra beneficial than approximately first quarter it particularly is seen devoid of any situation in case you comprehend the place to look. possibly they think of that it actually is basically up in the time of the night, and not in the time of the day. this might't be actual; it orbits the Earth, creating an entire circle as quickly as a month or so (the word 'month' easily comes from 'Moon'). It orbits in variety of the comparable direction that the solar follows on the sky, so each and every so often it is going to be between the Earth and solar, putting it up interior the sky on the comparable time using fact the solar, it somewhat is, in the time of the day. i think of the respond is extra diffused and extra telling of how a lot of human beings stay their lives: they only do no longer notice what is going on around them. The Moon is elementary to be certain in the time of the day, if human beings might basically look up! how many situations have I seen eye-catching rainbows and breathtaking halos around the solar with multicolor sundogs and located that no one else has observed? maximum non-astronomers I seek advice from are bowled over to discover that they might see planets and guy-made satellites with their unaided eyes on virtually any clean night. yet all they might desire to do is look up and notice. "

2016-09-30 00:15:07 · answer #6 · answered by haslinger 4 · 0 0

B&Q paint would just flake off, and it would take too long to get served in B&Q.
Actually the Moon is brighter in winter when more light is reflected off the earth by snow, then reflected back.

2006-08-26 12:11:27 · answer #7 · answered by mexicanroadfuzz 2 · 0 0

7 cans

2006-08-25 17:08:12 · answer #8 · answered by thedevilinsidemademedoit 3 · 0 0

Huh ? It's the sun, not the moon that gives us daylight. Uh,the moon rotates around the Earth, so half the day it's out of sight. Read a book, please !!!!

2006-08-25 17:13:48 · answer #9 · answered by Vinegar Taster 7 · 0 0

More than we have on earth. And it would not provide more daylight, it would be nightlight (or even moonlight). And it would last no longer than it does now, but just be brighter.

2006-08-25 18:36:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers