English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm want to build a collection of evidence; documented stuff is best, but not necessary.

#1.
A picture of a steel beam, from one of the towers, that has been cut using an explosive (Thermate). Click pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

#2.
A semi clear picture of Osama, taken from "his" confession video, compared and contrasted to his photograph.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml

#3.
Maj. General A. Stubblebine,"The plane does not fit the hole..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

2006-08-25 15:41:00 · 20 answers · asked by Joe_Pardy 5 in Politics & Government Government

"Farish" Do you think that a bunch of cave dwellers could do better ?

2006-08-25 15:52:13 · update #1

"neko" That stuff is real funny; I like it, But I'm looking for evidence. Thanks for the Joke and Info though.

2006-08-25 15:57:49 · update #2

"ggarsk" I hear Pres. Bush claims to have seen the first tower get hit, on T.V. before it was even aired on T.V. Was that a boo boo, or was he watching a prepositioned "Closed Circuit" T.V. ?

2006-08-25 16:07:07 · update #3

"Gonzo Zappa" Good points. I wonder if that stuff can be documented somehow ? I'll look for the German and Swiss link too.

2006-08-25 16:13:46 · update #4

"Black Sabbath" Very interesting video: Shows a plane can vaporize on impact. I wish we could see the front of the wall, after impact, so we could see what the planes imprint on it looks like.

2006-08-25 18:41:56 · update #5

"Nick K" I've seen those videos too; seems like a stretch to me too.

2006-08-25 18:46:34 · update #6

"Sgt. Rock" I will settle for evidence on either side; no proof necessary. Anyone who can find some is no nut to me. Belief without some evidence requires faith or trust in someone: something I'm in short supply of these days.

2006-08-25 18:55:43 · update #7

"christopher s" Yes, but just who were the terrorists who did the attack ?

2006-08-25 18:59:25 · update #8

"forzaitalia232569" I hope we do not expand the war into Iran. That would mean the draft would probably be necessary.

2006-08-25 19:10:08 · update #9

"nate" Yes, I have read a little on the "Gulf of Tonkin"; nasty. I hear you; people all over the world are listening.

2006-08-25 19:17:29 · update #10

"trlz_666" Yea, I saw pictures of defined puffs of smoke, coming out of the buildings, just before the destruction wave.

2006-09-01 06:31:49 · update #11

"take_me_to_the_Beach" Yes, I know it's hard to believe this bunch could have pulled it off, yet the hard evidence is pointing, in that direction.

2006-09-01 06:36:59 · update #12

"windfishfighter" Yes, those fires did seem kind of small, I heard a recording from a firefighter who made it to the top. He said,"We've got two isolated pockets of fire, we should be able to knock it down with two lines."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtBGKSZNWB4&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=7

2006-09-01 06:48:57 · update #13

"Karljt" Big list ! #3 and #8: Yes, I caught that clip, where owner Larry Silverstien admitted to "pulling" WTC7. Yet, the 911 commision, concluded it came down by fire. Go figure !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtBGKSZNWB4&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=7

2006-09-01 07:02:10 · update #14

"walterstoney" The cell phone conversations, where callers said the plane had been hijacked.
http://www.10meters.com/centercellphones.html
I'm hearing cellphones don't work from planes to ground and that airphones can't reach the bathroom, where the call is being made from.

2006-09-01 07:46:31 · update #15

"lesly1223" I'm looking into it, I think he referred to it as "New World Order": Thanks !

2006-09-01 07:52:12 · update #16

"david w" Glad you like it !

2006-09-01 07:54:39 · update #17

"Eric F" I agree with you, that this bunch is incompetent; it shows they are not working together, in all the loose ends they leave. Unfortunately, it is the people who will have to pay for it.

2006-09-01 08:03:40 · update #18

"corky" I no longer trust the newspaper or T.V.; they are to onesided. They seem to be running scared or bought off. Who needs propaganda for news.

2006-09-01 08:10:31 · update #19

20 answers

First off this government is very capable of pulling somthing like that off. Because most of them are Skulls and Bones it would have been easy for them. My favorite piece was the pictures of the explosions coming out of the building 10floors below the collapse. Also beine a former carpenter I understand how thosethings are built and I understand how metal will weaken and building 2 should have fell sideways if it was not controlled. Look up Loose Change and they have a great documentary

2006-08-25 21:04:27 · answer #1 · answered by trl_666 4 · 1 1

1.What is the strange pod on the right hand side of the underbelly of the plane that slammed into the south tower. There is nothing remotely similar to that on a commercial jet. Also the underbelly of a commercial boing 757 jet is very smooth and the one that hit the south tower has ridges along the entire length of the
underbelly.

2.On the footage of the plane hitting the North tower there is a clear, massive flash of light BEFORE the plane strikes the building. It has been slowed down many times and there is a clear, very bright flash of light well before the plane hits the tower. You can check for yourself, after all you are journalists.

3.Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of the entire world trade center site and he is on film saying that he ordered WTC 7 to be demolished at 5 pm on September 11 but it takes weeks or even months to plan a demolition on that scale.

4.Engineering experts from all over the world have said that the twin towers collapses had all the hallmarks of controlled explosives. Both buildings fell at freefall speed which is only possible with strategically placed explosives (flashes of thermite has been discovered on some clips of the towers falling. They also reminded us that no steel building has ever (before or since 9/11) been destroyed by intense fire.

5.The crash site in Pennsylvania showed absolutely no signs of aircraft debris. (or human remains according to the coroner at the scene). He said "I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes because there wasn't a single drop of blood to be found.

6.The Pentagon is one of the most videotaped buildings on Planet Earth. On 9/11 there were 8 cameras on the outside of the Pentagon facing in the direction that the object came from. The amount of footage that captured the object that hit the Pentagon must have been huge yet the only thing that the world has seen so far is around 18 grainy images of something that looks nothing like a commercial airline.

7. After the Pentagon was hit by an object the outer wall remained intact for about 1-2 hours after the strike. that would be absolutely impossible if a 100 ton 50 foot high commercial jet slammed into it (without leaving a single mark on the lawn of the Pentagon)

8. The 9/11 commission report concluded that WTC 7 (which was never hit by aircraft) was destroyed by fire when Larry Silverstein is on video tape saying that they decided to "PULL" the building (demolish it with explosives) He would not have gotten a cent in insurance if the 9/11 commision report had concluded that WTC 7 was demolished with explosives.

9. Why did US secretary of state Condoleeza Rice telephone the mayor of San Francisco on September 10th 2001 to tell him not to fly to New York the next day amid security fears.

10.Isn't it more than a coincidence that Marvin Bush was director of security of the World trade centre until September 10th 2001 when he stepped down.

2006-08-30 10:44:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I can't find the link now, but I read where a class of German and Swiss engineering students built a handful of structurally-correct scale models of the twin towers, and couldn't even come close to getting the towers to fall the way they did using only jet fuel and building materials for accelerants and a heat source, as was true in the original disaster.

The best they could do was to get two of them to melt enough on one side for the weight of the top floors to tip them over like dominoes. Consensus agreed that likely, only charge-shaped demolitions by trained experts could get them to topple straight down rather than tipping over to one side, the side opposite where the jet fuel and wind were coming from.

Also, there is no logical reason in the world why Building # 7 should have collapsed on its own just from its proximity alone. It wasn't really all that close and the winds were fairly calm. It was a much, much shorter building and heat rises, it does not sink. That is one of the most basic laws of nature.

2006-08-25 16:01:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't understand WHY our government would do something like this in the first place. It would take WAY too many people to pull this off in the second place. Besides, it is almost impossible for someone to keep a secret in Washington. 5 years later you would have heard from at least 50 people by now that they were involved, etc.

A group of terrorist attacked the WTC in 2001. It wasn't our government or anything close.

2006-08-29 11:27:01 · answer #4 · answered by take_me_to_the_beach 3 · 0 0

My reasoning for why it's not.

Say for instance, a vast conspiracy with lots of planning and many people involved, did happen. How can they screw up Iraq so bad?
All they had to do was place the drugs on the drug dealer.

If they can attack their own country without any moral ambiguity to justify war. Why can't they have just planted some WMDs, then "find" them to further justify their war?

Because they're too incompetent for a conspiracy and over confident to pull off war with an end.

2006-08-31 23:28:42 · answer #5 · answered by Eric F 3 · 0 0

In every 9/11 recording i've seen there shows evidence of a flash before the plane crashes into each tower. Conspiracy nuts believe that it was a missle of sorts launched a moment before impact, and that they planes were not commerical airlines either.

2006-08-25 16:49:06 · answer #6 · answered by Nick K 1 · 0 0

pretext to war in Iraq and embeddedness in the region to potentially engage Iran. Gulf of Tonkin was our reason in the 1960's.....anyone done any research on that?

as for the "our gov't couldnt keep it quiet" arguement. thats nonsense. our Intelligence agencies keep exactly what they want quiet if its important enough. if nothing can realistically be done by anyone or they can't be stopped, do you honestly think they care? no. think a little about it...what can you do? who will hear you? over the Jon Benet's news, or Ann Coulters, or Brangelina....you are a whisper in the corner.

sorry to be so somber, but thats our reality. anyone living in a "see no evil" world is kidding themselves.

2006-08-25 19:08:38 · answer #7 · answered by nate 2 · 0 0

HOW CAN ANYONE THINK THAT 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB??? with the TV showing airplanes flying into the towers, with all the cel phone conversations wqith others stating the planes have been hijacked. SOMEONE MUST BE NUTS!!!!!!

2006-08-30 12:12:03 · answer #8 · answered by walterstoney 2 · 0 0

Here's the 1 thing you need to know about that, which proves it false.

Our government simply does not work well enough to pull something as grand as that off. It would require the co-operation of so many different branches of government that absolutely hate eachother for it to work.

2006-08-25 15:46:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i'm assuming you already know that the angles of the shadows on the two adult males are off, the guy on the left has shadows on his face with the solar coming from at the back of his suitable ear, the guy on the left's face is at midday or there abouts on his face, however the legs are diverse. So suitable now this image is my prominent against in view that its of course been doctored (2 human beings dealing with opposite instructions, the two finding right into a shadow.) as a methods because of the fact the Osama video is in contact you may desire to incorporate a link to the confession video so we are able to check a image of bin weighted down to the video, to no longer a image you assert is from the video. i like a solid conspiracy theory, makes super entertainment. yet you may desire to understand while to entice the line between entertainment and certainty. I additionally discover the conspiracy theories surrounding the Pentagon to be, arguably, greater convincing. even in the event that all of them low fee mass and inertia, yet they sound real looking. And so a methods as Flight ninety 3 is in contact, tell me it develop into shot down and tell me how all of us understand, and you may provoke me..

2016-12-11 15:31:20 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers