Can terrorism be defeated by warfare???

Question

...tom science

Answer 1

Ofcourse not.

War only pisses off more people and the higher the pissed off to happy people ratio gets the more terrorism increases.

Answer 2

Terrorism can only be defeated by E-D-U-C-A-T-I-O-N-

The terrorist are the ones who govern us.

The Illuminati are forging the "right major crisis" they need to make the Nations accept their New World order, ruled by the martial law.
They are the Illuminatis, and they own us,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :
Bush and Kerry | Skull and Bone : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8150571337669145794&q=Bush+skull

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Confessions (Nuremberg Diary)
http://www.snopes2.com/quotes/goering.htm
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994
"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name...and his number is Six hundred & sixty-six. (Rev. 13:15-18)

“the zenith meridian at Giza runs through Jupiter at the Hyades in Taurus”, this means “the kingdom (Jupiter) will be restored to Egypt (Taurus) at that precise moment. Thus, Osiris, the Bull of Egypt, will return from the dead at 22:18:13 on December 21, 2012.” El Cairo time.

Answer 3

No, it is highly improbable, since terrorism survives as long as there is one terrorist still alive, but warfare doesn't win until every one is happy with the occupying force (or suppressed by it). The odds are against that, and in fact, the larger the occupying force, the less accepting the indigent people will be. The bigger the weapons, the more force you use, the less likely that you will win the hearts of the local people who are trying to live on the land. What would the farmers want?

Answer 4

Isn't warfare a form of terrorism? Aren't unexploded cluster bomblets, Uranium dust, and giving candy to children so they'll approach convoys thus creating a human shield, acts of terrorism?

The means and the ends are one and the same. They can't be separated. Using violence to oppress and control people, means that some will use violence in return, and then the aggressors get to call them terrorists.

Warfare created terrorists last I checked. Murder a man's family and the same logic the murdering occupiers use, can be used by that man. And voila! You have a 'terrorist'.

Answer 5

Yes. Warfare is now all-inclusive and not confined to armed warfare alone. Use the combination of military, economic, social and psychological warfare and terrorism can be decimated--or, at the very least, the breeding and feeding grounds are denied to them.

Answer 6

It can be effective in suppressing and delaying terrorist. It can even be effective in defeating terrorism if the military is allowed to wipe out those who support the terrorists. Just a matter of defining what peripheral casualties the public will accept in the war against terrorism.

Answer 7

Can warfare be defeated by terrorism???

Answer 8

Or is warfare a kind of terrorism?

Answer 9

Would you prefer death squads/black bag operations? Talking to them doesn't work. Buying them off also hasn't worked. What is your solution? Oh, I know change your religion to their particular sect.

If that was the solution to just say Yesa Master. Hitler must have loved the hell out of the Jews.

Answer 10

Unfortuantely, I don't think warfare can completely end terroism. I do believe that it does curtail terroism by cutting off their abilities to carry out attacks. However, as long as their ideals are believed in, there will always be terroism. I wish there was an easy solution to this problem, but there is not.

Answer 11

Yes, but it wouldn't be pretty. China executes terrorists and makes the family pay for the bullets. They don't seem to have much a problem.