English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...tom science

2006-08-25 14:02:42 · 19 answers · asked by tom science 4 in Politics & Government Politics

19 answers

People died on both sides..No one won!

2006-08-25 14:05:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

We lost. Others will assume that the US merely directed the attacks in some shadowy behind the scenes scheme... Hezbollah leads to Iran and Iran is after all part of the "axis of evil" which is trying to develop nukes. So will those who are sworn enemies of the US view Israel v. Hezbollah as a proxy war between Iran the us? You bet. Watch the news casts...why is it when Israel attacked Lebanon people in the Middle East were burning the American flag?

2006-08-25 14:17:49 · answer #2 · answered by KayK 2 · 0 0

First, don't think each and every little thing Bush says. no longer thousands of UNARMED CIV&childrens, yet fairly thousands of destiny Hizbollah have been killed. There are no longer any Lebanese in Southern Lebanon. All are Hizbollah. Israel additionally controlled to do away with some previous missile stockpiles. So, that they had could desire to purchase new ones from u . s .. that's the reason the u . s . dragged the UN decision for thus long.

2016-12-11 15:28:01 · answer #3 · answered by kemmer 4 · 0 0

Once again Israel was shafted by the UN. Instead of finishing the job they permitted the crooks at the UN to promise them what they should have known was impossible to deliver. With France once again in charge of the peacekeepers how can they expect any positive results. The only way to handle Hezbollah is to wipe them out. Period. The second best way is to wipe out Iran and Syria. Without money Hezbollah could not continue. Just as the US should have attacked North Viet Nam and not fool with the insurgents in the south, Israel should have attacked Syria and Iran to show they were not fooling around.

2006-08-25 14:11:55 · answer #4 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 0 0

Hezzbollah won.
They held off Isreal. Which use to be a good army

2006-08-25 14:09:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hezbollah won.

...since hezbollah are classified by Bush as terrorists, and Bush admininistration pretty much helped 'negotiate' with terrorist/hezbollah to stop the war.....errrr 'cut and run' ...which is what Bush doesn't want to do in Iraq.

2006-08-25 14:07:57 · answer #6 · answered by JJ C 2 · 1 0

CNN, Foxnews, Yahoo, Google, NYTimes, Al-Jazeera, Al-Manar and about a million others, none of whom were directly affected.

2006-08-25 15:07:58 · answer #7 · answered by Bob B 2 · 0 0

You can be sure it was neither of the civilian populations of either side - only idiots or fanatics wage war...

2006-08-25 14:09:23 · answer #8 · answered by Glenn W 1 · 0 0

Iran and Syria

2006-08-25 20:45:16 · answer #9 · answered by jack jr 3 · 0 0

hezzbollah but it's not really winning because the ppl in lebenon lost their home/family members, loved ones and their stuff

2006-08-25 14:08:30 · answer #10 · answered by ♥◦◊◦Brown eyed babe◦◊◦♥ 3 · 1 0

Does anybody ever really win a war?

2006-08-25 14:07:54 · answer #11 · answered by CMSgt342 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers