Nope
2006-08-25 13:31:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jasmine 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes, and there is many reasons, that criminalize many peoples, making a ..... reservoir of crimes, to maintain the judiciary system, pay judges, polices, advocates, to continue to make the money illegally, undergroung.
http://www.illuminati-news.com/marijuana-conspiracy.htm
Legal mari = low prices, and no toxic products on it = no more crime organosation that can offer a product that can concurrence with the legal product ( price, quality)
= no more violance related to mari.
No taboo, and education of the masses about is use = reduction, of the social problem related to use. Same for price, it would greatly decrease the social crimes related to the "money funding" for marijuana.
It is proven, that it have NO RELATION WITH BREAST CANCER.
THE FIRST CROPS ON MOST STATE OF THE USA WAS HEMP !!!
IT WAS ILLEGAL TO NOT GROW HEMP.
GEORGE WASHINGTON WAS GROWING HEMP.
http://www.illuminati-news.com/marijuana-conspiracy.htm
The Illuminati are forging the "right major crisis" they need to make the Nations accept their New World order, ruled by the martial law.
They are the Illuminatis, and they own us,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :
Bush and Kerry | Skull and Bone : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8150571337669145794&q=Bush+skull
Loose Change 2 Nd Edition : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7218920724339766288&q=
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Confessions (Nuremberg Diary)
http://www.snopes2.com/quotes/goering.htm
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994
"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_consciousness (Class consciousness)
And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name...and his number is Six hundred & sixty-six. (Rev. 13:15-18)
“the zenith meridian at Giza runs through Jupiter at the Hyades in Taurus”, this means “the kingdom (Jupiter) will be restored to Egypt (Taurus) at that precise moment. Thus, Osiris, the Bull of Egypt, will return from the dead at 22:18:13 on December 21, 2012.” El Cairo time.
2006-08-26 04:28:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Patriot 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Marijuana and all other recreational drugs should be legalized. People should have the right to put any substance they want on their own bodies, especially when it has long-documented medical value. Money that is being used to eradicated pot plants, jail users and dealers, etc, could be better spent. Also, legalization would get drug dealing out of the hands of gangs, the Mafia and other criminals.
2006-08-25 21:42:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No I dont think it should, everyone would be high all the time, more kids would start doing it. It's just not something that could be legal and not cause any problems. Don't get me wrong, I'm not strongly against marijuana itself. I even smoke it sometimes. But it shouldnt be legal.
2006-08-25 21:04:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
marijuana is the most commonly uses illegal substance in the United States. it is used by many people, most of which aren't your stereotypical "druggie", with no life agead of them. Many of them hapen to be very successful, good people. Think about it almost if not every person who reads this paper will know (even if they don't realize it) at least one if not several regular users of marijuana. Its often made out to be much more harmful htan it really is, unfortunatly not every one realizes this.
What many people don't realize is marijuana is much less harmful than alcohol or tobacco. Yet it's the one of the three that gets a bad rap and is illegal. Marijuana isn't even physicaly addicting. You certanly don't see meetings for marijuana like you do with alcohol and AA. Unfortunatly due to American culture the less harmful of the three is illegal.
The most common reason why marijuana can be harmful is that people can often come across laced marijuana without realizing it. Marijuana can easily be mixed with other more harmful drugs with out the buyer realizing it, until they have already used it. This is a dangerous thing that causes many people to do more harmful, hard core drugs without realizing it. If it were to be legalized the government could provide guide lines, like it does with alchol to insure that people knew what they were putting into their bodies.
Marijuana actually has many helpful benefits toward diseases / sicknesses. Marijuana can reduce nausea, vomiting, and loss of appetite caused by AIDS. It can Reduce interlobular pressure, which alleviates the pain and slowing and sometimes even stopping the progress of glaucoma. Common side effects of chemotherapy are nausea, loss of appetite, and vomiting, all of which marijuana would help. It can limit muscle pain and relieve tremor nad unsteadiness of gait for multiple sclerosis patients. Marijuana can help prevent epileptic seizures in some patients. It can also alleviate chronic, often debilitating pain caused by myriad disorders and injuries. Each one of these applications have been deemed legitimate by at least one United States court, legislature, and/or government agency.
Due to these reasons and many others many people are going to jail/prison on a daily basis due to simply smoking a little pot These aren't dangerous criminals that would kill or rape someone. Many of them are teachers, lawyers and respected members of their communities. But yet we still pay thousands of dollars of tax payers money to lock up non dangerous "criminals" yearly even though most aren't going to stop after they get out of jail. Don't you think the money spent here is a waste? Couldn't it be going to more useful things such as hospitals, disease research, or better schools? These are the things that would benifit the people of this country. Certanily you would rather benefit the people more than throwing a non violent pot head in jail who was only trying to smoke a joint and relax after a long days work in jail. There is up to forty million regular (note thats just the regular not occasional users) drug users in the United states. If we were to throw all of them in jail it would cost $500,000 per million people, plus the cost and space of building many more prisons. Couldm't that money be spent on building hospitals? There's already about 1.5 million people tax payers are paying to keep in jail over drugs. From 1990 to 2003, nearly 5.9 million people had been arrested for smoking marijuana. Thats a greater number than the entire population of Alaska, Delaware, The District of Columbia, Montania, North and South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming combined. This country simply can't afford to put 40 million more in jail.
Marijuana should be legalized. It has many uses such as helping sick patients. People are going to smoke it no matter what the government sais, and with out govenment guidelines this can be dangerous. Not to mention the fact that we have no way we can afford to throw all those people in jail. Its much less harmful than alcohol and tobacco, which are legal, so doesn't it make sense that it would be also?
2006-08-28 16:19:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even though I don't partake, I have to say yes. I have some close friends who do, and I know that it does them no worse than beer does me. I refrain because I don't want to lose my job (like they did!).
And I hate p*ss tests because the single out the pot smokers while other, harder drugs don't get caught. Besides, what right does a company have to judge what one does on ones own time? As long as you are not under the influence on company time or company property, they should have no say.
2006-08-25 20:34:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tim C 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
No. With alcohal, the person consuming it has to physcially pick up a glass and drink it. With marijuana, it is smoked, and the smoke from it can cover a large area. It would be possible for a person to get "buzzed" without even being aware of it from second hand smoke, and place themselves and others risk. No person has the right to place others at risk for their actions. Marijuana should be illegal.
2006-08-25 20:33:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by dewcoons 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes, I see no reason why it should be illegal to begin with. If people can drink in moderation and still be considered functional members of society, why can't we do the same with pot? In all my experiance I've seen the most harm come from alcohol. Why isn't alcohol illegal? I think we all know the answer to that...
2006-08-25 20:35:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by hawt2trawt 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
If it were I feel there would be less problem with alcohol as there would be an alternative and most people like to get high on something. I don't drink alcohol and would grow pot if it were allowed.
2006-08-25 20:33:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by doggiebike 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
yes. sell it in packs like ciggarettes and the tax created should go to schools or athletic programs or music programs.. and people could grow it and sell it and they would have to pay tax on the money they make.. maybe.. but you should also get it for dui if your stoned and cant seem to drive right..
2006-08-25 20:36:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by notaclue 2
·
1⤊
0⤋