why are they dropping pluto as a planet?

Question

saw it on cnn.. pluto no longer a planet. why did they drop it? && what are they calling it now.. if it aint a planet.. then what is it?

Answer 1

See News at Yahoo.com -- Seems to me it's still under debate:

Here's the article:

Dinky Pluto loses its status as planet By WILLIAM J. KOLE, Associated Press Writer
Fri Aug 25, 1:30 AM ET
PRAGUE, Czech Republic - Pluto, beloved by some as a cosmic underdog but scorned by astronomers who considered it too dinky and distant, was unceremoniously stripped of its status as a planet Thursday.

The International Astronomical Union, dramatically reversing course just a week after floating the idea of reaffirming Pluto's planethood and adding three new planets to Earth's neighborhood, downgraded the ninth rock from the sun in historic new galactic guidelines.

The shift will have the world's teachers scrambling to alter lesson plans just as schools open for the fall term.

"It will all take some explanation, but it is really just a reclassification and I can't see that it will cause any problems," said Neil Crumpton, who teaches science at a high school north of London. "Science is an evolving subject and always will be."

Powerful new telescopes, experts said, are changing the way they size up the mysteries of the solar system and beyond. But the scientists at the conference showed a soft side, waving plush toys of the Walt Disney character Pluto the dog — and insisting that Pluto's spirit will live on in the exciting discoveries yet to come.

"The word 'planet' and the idea of planets can be emotional because they're something we learn as children," said Richard Binzel, a professor of planetary science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who helped hammer out the new definition.

"This is really all about science, which is all about getting new facts," he said. "Science has marched on. ... Many more Plutos wait to be discovered."

Pluto, a planet since 1930, got the boot because it didn't meet the new rules, which say a planet not only must orbit the sun and be large enough to assume a nearly round shape, but must "clear the neighborhood around its orbit." That disqualifies Pluto, whose oblong orbit overlaps Neptune's, downsizing the solar system to eight planets from the traditional nine.

Astronomers have labored without a universal definition of a planet since well before the time of Copernicus, who proved that the Earth revolves around the sun, and the experts gathered in Prague burst into applause when the guidelines were passed.

Predictably, Pluto's demotion provoked plenty of wistful nostalgia.

"It's disappointing in a way, and confusing," said Patricia Tombaugh, the 93-year-old widow of Pluto discoverer Clyde Tombaugh.

"I don't know just how you handle it. It kind of sounds like I just lost my job," she said from Las Cruces, N.M. "But I understand science is not something that just sits there. It goes on. Clyde finally said before he died, 'It's there. Whatever it is. It is there.'"

The decision by the IAU, the official arbiter of heavenly objects, restricts membership in the elite cosmic club to the eight classical planets: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune.

Pluto and objects like it will be known as "dwarf planets," which raised some thorny questions about semantics: If a raincoat is still a coat, and a cell phone is still a phone, why isn't a dwarf planet still a planet?

NASA said Pluto's downgrade would not affect its $700 million New Horizons spacecraft mission, which this year began a 9 1/2-year journey to the oddball object to unearth more of its secrets.

But mission head Alan Stern said he was "embarrassed" by Pluto's undoing and predicted that Thursday's vote would not end the debate. Although 2,500 astronomers from 75 nations attended the conference, only about 300 showed up to vote.

"It's a sloppy definition. It's bad science," he said. "It ain't over."

Under the new rules, two of the three objects that came tantalizingly close to planethood will join Pluto as dwarfs: the asteroid Ceres, which was a planet in the 1800s before it got demoted, and 2003 UB313, an icy object slightly larger than Pluto whose discoverer, Michael Brown of the California Institute of Technology, has nicknamed "Xena." The third object, Pluto's largest moon, Charon, isn't in line for any special designation.

Brown, whose Xena find rekindled calls for Pluto's demise because it showed it isn't nearly as unique as it once seemed, waxed philosophical.

"Eight is enough," he said, jokingly adding: "I may go down in history as the guy who killed Pluto."

Demoting the icy orb named for the Roman god of the underworld isn't personal — it's just business — said Jack Horkheimer, director of the Miami Space Transit Planetarium and host of the PBS show "Star Gazer."

"It's like an amicable divorce," he said. "The legal status has changed but the person really hasn't. It's just single again."

AP Science Writers Alicia Chang in Los Angeles and Seth Borenstein in Washington, and correspondents Sue Leeman in London and Mike Schneider in Cape Canaveral, Fla., contributed to this story.

On the Net:

International Astronomical Union, http://www.iau.org

Answer 2

Because NASA and other astronomy groups are worthless, wastes of time. They really could care less rather Pluto is a planet,dwarf or moon. This is their way of soaking up another $30 zillion dollars for useless research , a lot like the piece of **** erector-set they used on Mars to try to take a couple photos. Why in god's name are we giving any more money to this kind of research? Why can't we funnel these funds into cancer research and cures for the "incurable" diseases. By now we should have conquered AIDS and Cancer and anyother disease. But no, we crippled the valuable research for useless **** like this.

Answer 3

They're saying Pluto is a dwarf planet and believe it used to be one of Neptune's moons. Even though Charon, (Pluto's moon) orbits Pluto, since Pluto is in Neptune's orbit, that declassifies it as a true planet.

Pluto's size has nothing to do with it. Don't listen to that dork who posted above me.

Answer 4

If scientists settle directly to relegate Pluto from planet prestige then i'd would desire to alter the mneumonic for remembering the planets; My somewhat hassle-free approach: in basic terms set up 9 Planets then what's going to I do? Scientist would desire to be waiting to discover a posh definition for planets and probable the likes of you and that i won't be able to be waiting to appreciate it. for my area, i'd choose that they go away the planets as they are. we would desire to continuously be content textile to appreciate that Pluto became into the 1st of the Kuipier Belt gadgets to be got here upon. inspite of the certainty that there are believed to be extra desirable than 70,000 KBOs in basic terms a handful are believed to be of similar length to that of Pluto so I see no injury in giving those extra desirable ones names besides. i'd fairly that our top astronomers have been devoting extra time to different issues like expertise dark rely as an occasion.

Answer 5

It is because it is too small and it is a dwarf planet

Answer 6

I'm not really sure, but my brother said that they are considering it a meteorite.