Is liberalism a disease, mental disorder, or willful stupidity?

Question

My guess is all three. That's why liberals still wet the bed and complain about election 2000 in 2006.

The textbook definition of liberal does not apply to the sub-human class of defeatists on the left that murder babies.

Answer 1

I choose D all of the above.

Answerman--- haha you busted your own stupidity that's Savage not Rush------idiot.

And you are not free if you live off of government programs. Being free means you support yourself not let the tax payers pay your way,, which is what liveralism is today. The old definition of liveralism doesn't apply with Dems today.

Answer 2

This applies to your type:

Indoctrination, as deception by the other, coexists with self-deception at many ideological levels, which include politics, economics, and religion. Like viruses it spreads itself with inexorable consequences.

Noam Chomsky has been quoted saying, "For those who stubbornly seek freedom, there can be no more urgent task than to come to understand the mechanisms and practices of indoctrination. These are easy to perceive in the totalitarian societies, much less so in the system of 'brainwashing under freedom' to which we are subjected and which all too often we serve as willing or unwitting instruments."

The subtle effects of a highly indoctrinated environment may rise unexpectedly to the surface in examining a culturally-freighted term such as "knee-jerk skeptic": the hearer recognizes immediately the cognate expression "knee-jerk liberal", describing a person considered to be thoughtlessly and inappropriately liberal, instinctively and on all occasions. Then the sub-text presents itself: it has been assumed. As Robert Jay Lifton has argued, in his discussions about thought-reform and totalism, the objective of these phrases or slogans is less to continue reflective conversations than to replace them with emotionally appealing phrases, for example, the opposing slogans "blood for oil" or "cut and run," both of which replace productive dialogue about objectives in the Iraq war.

Answer 3

None of the three choices you gave.

Since you obviously don't know what it is, let me define it for you:

liberalism (n.) The state or quality of being liberal.
liberalism (n.) A political theory founded on the natural goodness of humans and the autonomy of the individual and favoring civil and political liberties, government by law with the consent of the governed, and protection from arbitrary authority.
liberalism (n.) An economic theory in favor of laissez-faire, the free market, and the gold standard.

Answer 4

I'm changing my nickname to RepubNazi.
Then I'll post several questions, asking if DemoNazi or
D-N Communist has a mental disorder or is willfully stupid.
Sound good?
I already know that your kind is a disease.

Answer 5

it a right a know you right winger have a problem with that that why you have to name call.George Washington was a liberal what a weird idea having a person pick there leader he got cal all type if name Go BUCKS

Answer 6

Oh wait! shouldn't have u spelled Republicans? They r actually an acute psychiatric disease and a very dangerous one!

Answer 7

people are going to be "complaining" about the 2000 election two hundred years from now, in history textbooks

why? because it was historically undemocratic.

Answer 8

It's a light in the darkness. A shining beacon in the morass of ultra-conservative ignorance fostered by republicans and their ilk, who would have us all be stupid and obedient and do what they say.

And I've never killed a baby...unlike Bush's wars, where thousands of them have been killed AFTER they were born...

Answer 9

Intelligence is always a mystery to those born without any conscious awareness of it.

Answer 10

No...Why can't conservatives come up with anything else besides the name calling and repeat stupid questions like this one?