2006-08-25 10:47:31 · 11 answers · asked by Pixxxie 4 in Sports ➔ Cricket
Jax, you & me are singing from the same hymn book on this one.
Darryl Hair is singularly the most corrupt, racist, bigoted, pathetic excuse for a man I have ever come across.
He orchestrated this whole affair with hopes of getting a mega pay-off and writing another book. Not to mention his bet on the result of the 4th test, that has yet to be revealed, trust me.
I still want to hear from all his other 'supporters' who have gone oh so quiet now. What I have been saying for days has come true.
Where is that stupid monkey BrinLarr, I want to kick him in the teeth.
2006-08-25 17:14:55 · answer #1 · answered by vaivagabundo 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, its very damming information. I would also like to apologise for the accusations that I made saying Pakistan must have changed the shape of the ball and therefore be cheats. Upon reflection there was not enough valid information to actually support claims that the ball was tampered with, either through scruffy the ball or being hit into the sideboards.
For years Pakistan have been accused of ball tampering through the media. Swinging the ball as the ball gets older. Then other players from different countries supported the argument and the next thing you know people are saying it is possible. Yes it does seem unfair that a cricketing nation can be vilified because of this and consequently suspicions arise every time a ball tampering allegation is thrown anywhere near there direction.
Did they cheat, no evidence.
Was it fair to accuse them' not without any proof.
Darrel Hair was wrong. Yes should he appoligise.
2006-08-25 17:06:22 · answer #2 · answered by Bru 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ICC will not ask for any evidence and they will most probably ban Inzy for 5 to 8 matches. Hair has no evidence. There were 28 cameras in the groud covering the match but none of them saw any thing! he is just against asian players. Remember what he did to Murli in Australia in 1995?
2016-03-17 02:41:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As usual the ugly side of Pakistani cricket has reared its head again. Just watch what the fielders were doing to the ball. At least this way ALL umpires will be watching more closely in future.
2006-08-25 15:57:57 · answer #4 · answered by Dave D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
250-1 betting odds at one stage might have something to do with his "fixing"the ball tempering issue
Why was Andrew Strauss and kevin peterson talking on th cell phone when this drama was taking place??
It is fishy to say the least..
2006-08-25 11:10:51 · answer #5 · answered by Ali 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I do not think any umpire will deliberately do such thing. Hair may
have his version to justify the action taken by him which he may
reveal at the time of adjudication of the issue. Till such time the adjudication is over it is not at all fair to blame anybody on this issue.
2006-08-25 19:09:31 · answer #6 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he made a spicy dish which is not very tasty plus he also added some extra to it which is not acceptable to any one.so he has to see whether he should eat that dish or throw it away.conclusion:oh what an example of stupidity.
2006-08-25 16:47:09 · answer #7 · answered by wats_in_d_name 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No he is not stupid.. but very crook... imagine how much he got from making a mtch controvertial... WHY he asked so much of money for resigning.... If he thinks he is right... why to resign for money... where is so called ethics...
2006-08-25 20:09:50 · answer #8 · answered by Its my Duty 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I was watching the new.... there was no evidance of ball tempering! so inzi was let go.... but why didnt they press charges agianst hair
2006-08-25 10:51:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He's stupid.
2006-08-25 10:53:15 · answer #10 · answered by Millsy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋