yes,isolate the variable and multiply the diameter by the prime numeric code.
2006-08-25 10:43:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by bumblebee_chola 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As someone has already pointed out the math involved in dealing with the fundamental shaping of the universe at sub-atomic levels is far from simple.
I would be very careful, however, of saying that complete knowledge of the how and why of the universe would not include a religious aspect.
Some philosophers (and even better - science fiction writers) have theorised that the belief of people in a god can create and give power to such a being. Quantum theory allows, indeed insists on, spontaneous creation.
There are many complex systems, almost invariably controlled by computers, that can make matter behave this way or that way. Who is to say that a machine as complex as the human brain could not affect matter at the quantum choice level by means that we are, as yet, totally unaware of.
In the fullness of time almost every person, ordinary or expert, who states categorically that such-and-such a thing cannot happen, is eventually proved wrong.
2006-08-25 11:14:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by narkypoon 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it can't -- we've discovered over the past several hundred years that things are more complex than that. And what Einstein worked on was simply a way to unify relativity and quantum mechanics, which has nothing to do with religion (he was somewhere between an agnostic and an atheist).
String theory holds some promise of unifying relativity and quantum mechanics, by going a level lower and giving mathematical descriptions of how all matter AND forces arise from multi-dimensional vibrations of strands of energy called "strings" -- but I'd hardly call the math involved in string theory "simple," and string theory (if true) still opens even more questions that will require even more complex math to solve. And religion isn't in there anywhere...being made up by people and not having anything to do with the phyiscal universe!
2006-08-25 10:45:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Stephen Hawking called it a "Grand Unifying Theory". he worked on it for some time, unsuccessfully. I understand that Einstein also had a go.
In my totally irrelevant opinion, I hope there will always be questions, no matter how clever we get. It would be so sad to have no mystery in life. I believe that it is doubts that unite us. It's usually people are absolutely certain they have got it right who cause all the trouble.
2006-08-25 11:46:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rich N 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
There are too many variables, and too much chance for it to be simple maths.
It can't link religion in because that is part of human psychology and sociology, and even more complex.
I love the word "evoloved", though. You should copyright it.
2006-08-25 10:46:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by hi_patia 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Religion is a method to realise god so there must be some equations that can explain the entire universe. a single equation cannot consist of so many variables that come into play unless the equation has only two variables mass and energy
2006-08-25 20:47:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by ammu 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is a mathematical formula governing the universe and everything in it. That is Life, Space, Time, the lot, but fortunately or unfortunately for us and the likes of Einstein, Hawkings etc, its far too complex for us and our computers. Stick to the Vinto. At least you know whats in it.
2006-08-25 10:46:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Einstein worked on this problem through the latter part of his life, seeking a single equation that would explain everything in the universe. He never did come up with a satisfactory solution to the problem.
2006-08-25 10:39:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by RG 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Our state only replaced the annual try, and the hot ones are horror memories on paper. The 0.33 grade one, which I observed given for the 1st time final 12 months, had issues only like this, in spite of the actuality that it extremely is no longer a third grade customary. Now, this is truthfully a wager, yet i'm tremendously much guessing that your baby is arising on a standardized try, and the instructor is attempting to prepare the scholars for that try. the instructor in all likelihood has considered pattern exams, and is only attempting to make certain that the scholars have a minimal of considered the plausible kinds of issues a minimal of as quickly as formerly the truthfully try. sure, the standardized attempting out is ridiculous in this type of rely. sure this is only too no longer straightforward for third grade scholars. yet, this is there. there's no longer plenty a instructor can do different than prepare the scholars as ultimate as she (or he) can. Please tell us in case you detect out why a concern this hard become given on your baby.
2016-12-14 11:57:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by kleid 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In what languages is written Bibble? - humans. Whose mistakes we can find there? - humans. Who was writting by Gods bless? - humans. Compare size of Bibble book with Gods wisdom and you will understand what I am talking about. Think how many parts of Bible were posibly cut off and wrongly rewrote. We will look for truth and answers as long as we will exist and many people will try to prevent it because of many reasons even in good intentions like parents guarding their children from world evil and weak to explain why it must exist.
2006-08-25 10:56:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Robert M Mrok (Gloom) 4
·
0⤊
0⤋