What do you think are the limits, if any, should be applied to the 2nd Amendment?

Answer 1

1.) American citizens only
2.) No felonies
3.) Background checks are okay
4.) No waiting period

Answer 2

Do you want to know what I think? The answer is a resounding NO! What other parts of the Bill of Rights do you want to limit next?

Why do I think there should be no limitations on the 2nd Amendment. OK.....do some research....The last Supreme Commander of Nazi Germany was Admiral Karl Doernitz...When interrogated after the war he was asked why the Germans didn't invade the east coast of the U.S. To which he replied (and I am paraphrasing here), "We weren't THAT crazy! Your popualtion is armed! Your citizenry would caused many more casualties than any organized army!"

And THAT'S why I DON'T support limitations on the 2nd Amendment.

Answer 3

while you would think that the second amendment would have the same powers as the rest of the bill of rights the US supreme court has not ruled that way and has allowed each state to place restrictions/limits on the 2nd for example try buying a gun in NY city or NJ almost impossible go to WV and no problem buying a gun

Answer 4

There are almost 20000 laws governing firearms in the US already . A few more will make no difference .
A common misconception that felons can't legally own firearms makes people feel safer . Felons just have to file their paper work with the BATF and pay the $10000 registration fee .

Answer 5

None. Well, citizens only.

The Founders intended the citizens of this country to be well-armed, so that they could stand up to the socialist scum (like the Demoncraps) that try to control everything, to take away their freedoms and interfere with their moral values.

Answer 6

There are limits in place already. Convicted felons may own firearms, the insane may not own firearms etc.... these are reasonable in my opinion as a Gun Owner.