English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-25 09:30:50 · 26 answers · asked by Zayne P 1 in News & Events Other - News & Events

26 answers

The January 18, 2006 tape made reference to the leaking of a British memo claiming that U.S. President George W. Bush had suggested bombing al-Jazeera's offices in Qatar to British Prime Minister Tony Blair; this story broke in the British press on November 22, 2005. In addition, it included other comments that were indicative of it being recent, including a mention of polls that show the American publics declining support for remaining in Iraq.

In the same tape, over 11 minutes long, Bin Laden vowed never to be captured alive and denounced the United States as no better than Saddam Hussein: "The jihad (holy war) is ongoing, thank God, despite all the oppressive measures adopted by the U.S. Army and its agents, [which has reached] a point where there is no difference between this criminality and Saddam's criminality" [19].

On April 23, 2006 yet another purported Bin Laden audio recording appeared. This tape came at a time when President Bush was under increasing political pressure to remove American troops from Iraq and when Iraq seemed on the brink of all-out civil war. Bin Laden called on his followers to keep resisting Bush's "crusades" in the Middle East [20].

2006-08-26 04:35:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NO!!! we will not, that tale you wrote there has been going around for it slow now, I doubt it somewhat is even actual, yet ya on no account understand. Why might it basically be the president making bargains with terrorists, why no longer congressmen hell why no longer vast agency. If Bin encumbered continues to be alive, He particular is basically no longer in Iraq, he would be someplace it somewhat is extra friendly in the direction of the Bin Ladens', like u . s . a ., yet somewhat, extra like Afghanistan or the like. the two way who's to declare that he's not any longer already ineffective, seems to me that he had undesirable kidneys and necessary dialysis what a minimum of as quickly as each and every week if no longer the different week. I for one might discover it had to have self belief WE the main effective united states of america interior the international, a minimum of at one time, can no longer discover on sickly Muslim particularly with a 25 million bounty on his head. we could continuously basically pull out and turn that entire united states of america right into a huge glass bowl, i understand I easily have been there it particularly is a s**t hollow, I for one does not lose any sleep over it. basically my opinion, as an American , i'm entitled too.

2016-09-29 23:55:10 · answer #2 · answered by lininger 4 · 0 0

I'm a conspiracy theorist, so here goes. I believe that they (U.S. government) killed him years ago when he attacked the U.S. Embassy in Africa, then the U.S. Army cargo ship in the Aegean Sea. They knew 9/11 was coming, but all 11 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia and Egypt (our "allies") so they had to put a name and face to a "mastermind" who we will never "catch" because he more than likely no longer exists. What ever happened to Hussein's "trial"? Last I heard, he never attacked us.

2006-08-25 09:41:18 · answer #3 · answered by Thomas M 2 · 2 0

I'm sure he and Bush are having a spot of tea at this very moment at the white house... Just kidding... I'm sure we could have had him back when... but the government needs to keep us Americans up in the air. If they do get him there will be ten more to follow in his footsteps...

2006-08-28 13:08:03 · answer #4 · answered by GreenEYED Beauty 3 · 0 0

The American government knew where he was the minute 9/11 happened according to Michael Moore. We have all been brainwashed.

2006-08-25 09:49:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Thats a hard question. His niece of somebody says that he has a HUGE crush on Whitney Houston...So maybe they can come up with some kind of plan that includes her.
But.. I would hate to play hiding go seek against him.

2006-08-25 09:34:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

they don't want to. they could have if the really wanted to. just think if they really did, a large chunk of the middle east would go f*cking nuts on the US. the US barely has Afghanistan and Iraq under control. they don't need the rest of the place going ballistic

2006-08-25 18:09:45 · answer #7 · answered by Vodka 3 · 0 0

Probably not, you would think we would have caught up to him very quickly.
They probably want him free so that he can reign move havoc and we get to send our troops out for another battle.
War generates money and the economy needs to be jump started from time to time.

2006-08-25 09:44:15 · answer #8 · answered by jkahwaty 4 · 0 0

if they do, then we'll have to pull out of an oil rich area of the world AND won't be poised to invade iran on a moment's notice.. when the time is right, they will, but not after we've secured the middle east to our advantage.

2006-08-25 09:40:33 · answer #9 · answered by cliffy 3 · 1 0

Nope

2006-08-25 09:34:20 · answer #10 · answered by sweet 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers