Capitalism. Getting rewarded for your hard work and effort
2006-08-25 09:30:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by me 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
True communism is better. Communism offers a world where the people have democratic control over their industry and world. The production is for need, not profit, so there will be no starving (there is enough food produced now that everyone could have 4.5 pounds per day). Having no monetary unit will allow a free-access society so people can always get what they need when they need it, and let others use it when they are done. Do not consider communism to be in China, Cuba or the (former) USSR. This type of system was (and is) state-capitalism. Production was still for profit, people did not have a vote, ect. Communism has never been put into practice. Hope this helps.
2006-08-26 17:57:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Captain Socialism 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Communism
2006-08-30 11:07:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jennifer 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Communism in its fundamental form is bad though it has certain good points which should be adopted by capitalist countries for the good of the common man.Dictatorship of the proletariat is the worst form of dictatorship which caused untold miseries to millions of Russians in the past. Dictators may be good or bad and they may bring economic and social reforms fast but as human nature is unpredictable we do not know when the dictator will do something against the interests of the masses.So dictatorship is also not good for any country..As an economic philosophy communism has failed in Soviet Russia and it is going to fail in China too unless Chinese people understand why it failed in USSR and take remedial measures suiting the local conditions and adopting the good principles of capitalism and allowing religious freedom which does not question the sovereignty of the country.
2006-09-01 15:38:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by rama 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly, in spite of the shown fact that Communism is a "dictatorship of the proletariat," it somewhat is not any longer authoritarian in any way. you notice, Communism could be defined as Socialism after the State has "withered away." So devoid of type, private assets, and State, i come across it very difficult to have self belief that Communism could be seen something yet a heavily Libertarian ideology. Dictatorship, of direction, relies upon on the dictator. while you're taking Fascism, as an occasion, you have somewhat authoritarian dictators like Mussolini and Hitler. additionally, nevertheless, you've got Totalitarian regimes like Stalin's. in spite of the shown fact that, regularly, yet different than for Stalin and Communism (the former is entire., and the latter is virtually available Anarchism), dictatorship implies severe authoritarianism. a miles extra useful determination for a Left authoritarian ideology could be the Socialist State. using fact it has no longer phased out State and well-known governence yet, it particularly is seen authoritarian, yet in a collective, council-ish form.
2016-09-29 23:54:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by lininger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually there is no clear idea what Communism will be. Infact the government before Communism is a proletarian dictatorship which makes no sense since it requires 1 charismatic leader, examples Lenin and Mao who are put in power by a non elected council.
2006-08-30 12:07:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The question reveals a lack of understanding. Communism is an economic system while dictatorship is a political system.
You can have communism that is dictatorial or democratic. Just has capitalism can be either.
2006-09-01 01:00:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chuck N 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like this question. It's like, 'Why are we here?' In Communism, the State owns everything. You work twelve hour days, seven days a week for twenty-five cents a day, ask any Chinese national. Unless they are prisoners, prisoners get fed. Forgot one thing, the State owns you too.
Dictatorship? Know any older Jewish people? Ask them about Dictatorship. You might want to ask our 'President' about that too. He stated something like, dictatorship would be easier....as long as 'I'm" the dictator. Hummmm. Let me think about that.
For me, I like to work hard and make lots of money. How about you?
2006-08-31 13:08:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Communism. Look at how powerful China is.
2006-08-25 09:26:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by MikeL 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
neither, they eventually crumble in the end, because if your thinking about the communist manifesto, even though it is well-written, it has never been quite played out carefully enough, and a dictatorship always crumbles in the end, plus you have the pressure from the world community, who overall hate both of those types of rules
2006-08-25 10:20:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kremer 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
dictatorship is the best thing that can happen to any country as long as the dictator is an angel a good angel for that matter
2006-08-31 01:10:05
·
answer #11
·
answered by livinhapi 6
·
0⤊
0⤋