I cannot decide between the Cartier Pasha C and the Rolex Oyster Perpetual Lady-Datejust. Does someone have some experience or advice?
2006-08-25 07:51:57 · 20 answers · asked by Michelle N 1 in Beauty & Style ➔ Fashion & Accessories
Cartier Pasha C may be a good look, but a Rolex is a Rolex is a Rolex. Its a WATCH that people Watch.
Njoy....
2006-08-25 07:58:26 · answer #1 · answered by sanghvir 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rolex
2006-08-25 07:54:00 · answer #2 · answered by brendastarful 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Rolex is just so much more beautiful (and I think it's somewhat cheaper)...about the quality I don't know. I think even if I had the money I wouldn't pay 2000 or 3000 bucks for a watch, I would just get a cheap knock-off but that's just me.
2006-08-25 07:59:26 · answer #3 · answered by Filipe F 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cartier
2006-08-25 07:53:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that Cartier has a better women's watch and Rolex has a better men's watch. However, I prefer Omega.
2006-08-25 07:54:48 · answer #5 · answered by nondescript 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Quartz is a muchmaligned material in watchmaking. Because of the affordability of quartz watches, people — watch buffs or otherwise — don’t talk about them in the same breath as their mechanical counterparts. In fact, many watch snobs perceive quartz watches to be inferior but any connoisseur worth his Patek Philippe will remember the pivotal role quartz played in the history of watchmaking.
http://www.ewatchme.com
2014-08-06 19:37:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Rolex. If I had that caliber of money, I'd go that way
2006-08-25 07:53:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I myself prefer Tissot.....it's a great Swiss made watch.........if u want one of those 2,go for the Rolex......i like it better
2006-08-25 08:33:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Suunco
2006-08-25 07:53:59 · answer #9 · answered by Tusker9E 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most jewlers will tell you that the Omega is a much better watch for active people.
2006-08-25 07:58:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋