English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

Yeah he definitely needs supervision!

2006-08-25 06:09:56 · answer #1 · answered by Gone fishin' 7 · 0 1

no i do no longer think of they have been in contact in any respect. I did up until Karr became into arrested yet than listening to the unquestionably data and not the media mock-up i do no longer think of they are. yet what i became into thinking is that in the event that they understand somebody that became into in contact and arrested Karr to style of smoke out the unquestionably murderer - style of like the authentic murderer won't choose somebody else to take credit for his crime.... it style of feels unusual that a DA would usher in somebody in 10 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous homicide case on something as inconclusive as e-mails. i presumed they'd have some extra good data.

2016-12-17 17:06:08 · answer #2 · answered by alsobrook 4 · 0 0

oops..... had a blonde momento......spacial integrity kicked in and the satelite warfare hapened to me. I lost time.















Sure, why not? And one thing...please do not include me in the judical system of this country. It doesnt work. I ask kindly that the WE be stricken from the record and counselors larry and barbie approach the bar.
Court adjourned (gavel) Court will resume in 2 hours. The jury is now really OUT.......*can you get me a burger medium, swiss, no mustard, some coke, and make me an appt to see my therapist*.

2006-08-25 07:35:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

on what grounds? yes he's a sick pedophile and SHOULD be put away but the most he'll get is something like impeding a federal case or something like that. he'll get some time but not as much as he should. besides, if he does get into prison, they tend to not look too kindly on pedophiles if you know what I mean. however long he's sentenced to be in there, he won't make it until the end I'm sure of that.

2006-08-25 06:11:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No! What kind of justice do you peddle?! He's wasting police time, and may have some other offences that he should go down for, but you can't put him away for life if he's not guilty of the murder!!!

2006-08-25 06:10:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Something definitely needs to be done with him. He is a known pedophile, and apparently one who is extremely delusional. (All pedos are delusional, but him more so than most)

He definitely has no business being part of mainstream society. Whatever they do with him as long as he is not in society is OK by me.

2006-08-28 13:15:46 · answer #6 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 0 0

If he's not Jonbenet's murderer then we shouldn't convict him for murdering her. For the simple fact that if we do convict him for her murder, then if we ever found the real murderer, we couldn't convict HIM for her murder. Using him as a stand in for the real murderer is not sufficient for making things right.

2006-08-25 06:11:22 · answer #7 · answered by Jenn 6 · 1 0

I think so....That guy is creepy and a threat to society...... He has been arrested for child porn in two different countries....enough said there.... Not to mention he seems to be getting his kicks off of his own confession (false or not) of the molestation and murder of a six year old little girl....creepy bast*rd

2006-08-25 06:10:02 · answer #8 · answered by TommysGirl 1 · 1 0

Not unless you can convict him of another crime that he's committed. Remember, you're innocent until PROVEN guilty in America.

2006-08-25 06:10:24 · answer #9 · answered by sjoschko 3 · 2 0

I heard on my local news ( I live in cali) that they want him to appear here for questioning in a sexual assault case or something. hopefully theyll nail him on that

2006-08-28 22:31:40 · answer #10 · answered by New Mommy! 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers