Is it me or is the Democratic party the party of appeasers and cowardice?

Question

If you think we should combat Islamofascists, the DNC (Howeird Dean) will automatically call you a fascist warmonger that can't understand diplomacy.

Will the democrats come out in 2007, 'fighting' for the presidential nomination in Burkhas, or will they pose like they have a backbone, only to sliver back in their degenerate hole the next week?

War is not the answer to everything, but Islamofascism has demanded it. Democrats have their head so far up their ***. They'd rather play partisan politics and ***** about one phase of the war, the war itself, etc. instead of realizing that this is a fight for freedom.

They've played this political game many times before.

http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html

It seems as though Coragryph is speechless. Common sense helps on that issue, Cora.

W_Brian, of course the world isn't safer. It won't be safer until this fascism is wiped off of the map. The democrats are playing the pre-WWII game of appeasing Hitler YET AGAIN!

Dr. Twatson, were you for an invasion of Pakistan? Osama was going back and forth along the border. Another lacking in common sense.

Why did Clinton refuse Osama from Sudan? Why did Clinton embolden the terrorists by retreating from Somalia?

It's so glad to see delusion from the left like Doctor that thinks the Muslims loved us before Iraq and Afghanistan. Like I said, THE PARTY OF COWARDICE SPEAKS.

No, doctor, Muslims have been fanatical for quite some time.
http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/terrorism/101/timeline.html#1990

kookoobanana would likely start hurling gay insults at everyone while he is on his knees.

The answers on here are amazing. I know of at least 2 people that answered here that regularly throw out "I'm mainstream and belong to neither party!" Yet, when democrats are under attack, they engage in the very same resulting activity - Bash Bush and "Blame America First".

Why do liberals pose as independent thinkers and being "mainstream"?

Answer 1

I am a Democrat and agree completely with your statement. The leadership of the Democratic party is in serious need of a cranium rectal inversion. And you favorite Democrat, John Kerry, needs a muzzle.
Let's hope they do find a backbone this upcoming election.
PS
This is such an interesting debate you have going on here. I don't know why more of the Democrats don't see the wisdom in your argument. The only way we are going to beat this terrorists thing is if we stand shoulder-to-shoulder. Although we need swift, decisive military action against aggression, we are not going to win the war against terrorism by military might alone. We must cut the legs out from under the enemy. That being the wealth they are reaping from us thru oil revenue.
We need to move the country closer to energy independence to stop the revenue flow that is allowing countries like Iran to finance terrorists and develop nuclear weapons. So, where is the Democratic leadership who should be working on the aspect. Instead of helping, they are shooting arrows into the backs of those trying to protect America.
Yes, the Democratic party is failing you and me, as well as every other American.

Answer 2

It's a fight for freedom? These are the people that never said they wanted our help in the first place, and now that we are there, they want us to leave. The Iraqis have asked us in the past to leave so they can run their own country. The administration is worried that if we leave now, the terrorists will follow us home. So, why don't we go back into Afghanistan so we can hunt for Bin Laden and fight them where we were supposed to in the beginning? We'll get the terrorists out of Iraq so they can govern themselves and we will be sticking to the original plan. You are too much of an ignorant fool to even realize that the Democrats have plans for Iraq and they don't all just involve pulling out overnight. Phased withdrawls is what they are proposing, but your FOX soaked mind doesn't comprehend the common sense put forth by the left wing. WE HAD NO REASON TO GO INTO IRAQ WHEN WE DID!!! There has been no evidence to prove the validity of the reasons given by the Bush administration. When will YOU stop playing partisan politics and open your eyes to the real world! 60% of the nation has, come join us.

Answer 3

WE REAP WHAT WE SOW:

During Desert Storm the world was on our side, including most Muslim people, when we and the UN went into Kuwait to win it back from a foreign invader.

After 9-11 the world was on our side, including most Muslin people, when we went into Afghanistan after Osama and those actually responsible for the Twin Towers attacks.

When we had Osama cornered and surrounded our President suddenly decided to pull back, leaving Osama’s capture in the hands of local war lords, and decided to focus on Saddam. At the time Saddam was not a serious threat to us or the world. He was just another piss ant little dictator in another little country. The terrorists were the ones we should have stayed on the trail of.

Still, we all but deserted catching Osama so that we could invade Iraq.

Now, much of the world has turned against us, including most Muslims.

Why can’t some understand that we went after the wrong bad guy at the wrong time and for the wrong reasons?

Answer 4

Simple answer: It's you.

And if you think that Iraq had anything to do with The War on Terror, you are thankfully, finally in a small minority. The American people aren't eating the bullsh!t and calling it candy anymore. They have finally become aware that this administration had planned to go to war in Iraq all along and was simply looking for an excuse. In the meantime, terrorism worldwide is on the rise because the radical Islamists can point to Bush policies and recruit MORE terrorists.

The world is not safer, the Iraqi people are dying in greater numbers than they were under Saddam, bin Laden is still free, and Bush's foreign policy is the greatest failure in the post-Vietnam Era (if not all time).

Answer 5

Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert - avoided the draft, did not serve.
Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey - avoided the draft, did not serve.
Former House Majority Leader Tom Delay - avoided the draft, did not serve (1). "So many minority youths had volunteered ... that there was literally no room for patriotic folks like himself."
House Majority Whip Roy Blunt - did not serve
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist - did not serve. (An impressive medical resume, but not such a friend to cats in Boston.)
Majority Whip Mitch McConnell, R-KY - did not serve (1)
Rick Santorum, R-PA, third ranking Republican in the Senate - did not serve. (1)
George Felix Allen, Republican Senator from Virginia - a supporter of Nixon and the Vietnam war, did not serve. (1)
Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott - avoided the draft, did not serve.


Secretary of Defense Don Rumsfeld - served in the U.S. Navy (1954-57) as an aviator and flight instructor. (1) Served as President Reagan's Special Envoy to the Middle East and met with Saddam Hussein twice in 1983 and 1984.
GW Bush - decided that a six-year Nat'l Guard commitment really means four years. Still says that he's "been to war." Huh?
VP Cheney - several deferments (1, 2), the last by marriage (in his own words, "had other priorities than military service") (1)
Former Att'y Gen. John Ashcroft - did not serve (1, 2); received seven deferment to teach business ed at SW Missouri State

Jeb Bush, Florida Governor - did not serve. (1)


Karl Rove - avoided the draft, did not serve (1), too busy being a Republican.

Former Speaker Newt Gingrich - avoided the draft, did not serve (1, 2)
Former President Ronald Reagan - due to poor eyesight, served in a noncombat role making movies for the Army in southern California during WWII. He later seems to have confused his role as an actor playing a tail gunner with the real thing.
"B-1" Bob Dornan - avoided Korean War combat duty by enrolling in college acting classes (Orange County Weekly article). Enlisted only after the fighting was over in Korea.
Phil Gramm - avoided the draft, did not serve, four (?) student deferments


facts hurt dont they-------------

Answer 6

It's You. You gotta know by now that I'm a ***** & a c#nt,
and definetly, you must know that I'm not a coward.
At least, I can be contacted.
You're just a pu s sy hiding behind a computer.
Anger management - check into it.

When the terrorists do arrive, you'll be so busy bashing
liberals, you'll never see them comming.
Maybe, heads off to you, creep.

Answer 7

No it's me also, dems and libs are a bunch of ******* who want to bend over and take it up the Hershey highway from a bunch of muslims and islam nazi's. I pray to God that we can keep the dems out of power because America will be in some deep sh*t if these wimps are in power!

Answer 8

clinton did not refuse osama from sudan.

keep in mind, clinton's team protected us from the millenium bombing and didn't spend their terms telling us they were keeping us safe.

islamofacism is a ruse - read 1984 and stop being a stupid patsy. This is not a fight for freedom. no one is threatening our freedoms except bush. get a clue.

Answer 9

Democrats call themselves "progressive", but they always go backwards. "War is not the answer" That's all they know about the war and don't have any realistic answers. Democrats are content thinking they know what's "Not the Answer" and "what the war is ALL about... Oil". Their answer is for everyone to drive hybrids.

Answer 10

No it can't be you. You've posed such an intelligent, thought provoking question, it just can't be you!! We do like playing partisan politics but only if we're wearing our Burhkhas!!!