Honestly, in the history of the world, has anyone EVER died from lack of sex? No,......so then why do all these stupid f*ckers keep saying dumb sh*t like "he's got to have it" or "he *NEEDS* it"? You can not compare it to food, water, and air. It is not necessary for a persons suvival.
I JUST WANT TO ADD, THAT MOST MEN WOULD GET LAID A HELL OF A LOT MORE IF THEY WERE NOT @SSHOLES!!! ...be nice, get p*ssy. how hard is that to understand? idiots.
2006-08-25 04:09:26 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
Well I think sex is very important but I totally agree with you as far as mens outlook on it. I'm sick to death of them acting like they will die if they dont get it, sick to death of them having nothing else to talk about and also making it seem like women dont want sex or that we punish them by withholding it. They totally dont get the fact that if they are jerks we dont want to sleep with them. They totally dont understand that if they did some small things that we ask there would be more sex and it would be better sex because we would be happy. They are so dumb that they have not been able to realize how much better it would be for them. EVEN WHEN YOU GIVE THEM THE DAMN ROAD MAP THEY STILL F*CK UP. They truly are idiots.
2006-08-25 04:17:00 · answer #1 · answered by JustMe 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If men were not the aggressers then there will be no population. That is just the way men are. You sound like you were burned badly and have some issues with men. No, men will not die from lack of sex because they have 4 fingers and a thumb that can occupy them for the time being. There are lots of great guys out there you just need to be picky and find the right one. When you do the sex is unbelievable.
2006-08-25 04:18:00 · answer #2 · answered by luvlisteningtomusic 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
it's the difference between survival and well being that you are talking about. you are correct, no one needs sex in order to survive (except in a strictly genetic code kinda sense, but that is neither here nor there). on the other hand to maintain a state of well being (ie, healthy, relaxed, and cheerful) many people do need the cathartic stress relief of a good sexual encounter.
and as for getting laid alot more if men were nice. from my own experience i have found that that is both true and false. in some cases being nice works, in other cases playing the jack*ss bad boy is the fastest way into a woman's pants. it all depends on the woman.
2006-08-25 04:15:45 · answer #3 · answered by jude D 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If man does not physically need sex:
1) Why does the bible instruct women to provide for that need.
2) Why is lack of sex grounds for divorce.
Your second statement is quite correct. Men should be nice. But as far as the first statement, I have actually seen a man that refused to masturbate and had to go to the doctor because of painful testicles. The doctor instructed him to go home and take care of business. If a man repeatedly is excited and does not release the build up of semen it does become quite painful and it also makes him edgy. It is hard for a woman to understand about the same as a man will never understand the pain of childbirth.
It truly is a physical need whether women choose to believe it or not.
2006-08-25 04:18:06 · answer #4 · answered by Just Another Guy 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i hear you. ....personally, i would be ok to never have it again. it really doesn't make a diffenece to me. and i don't guess i'll ever understand some men. but i think you are right about that they would get it more often if they would be kinder (like they are in the beginning of a relationship). that's very true.
calm down though before you hurt yourself, it's gonna be alright.
2006-08-25 04:15:21 · answer #5 · answered by HazelEyes 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There is a difference between a need an an inpulse, as you have pointed out.
But on the other hand, to always deny your own sexuality is to invite some serious phycological problems into your life . . .
2006-08-25 04:13:36 · answer #6 · answered by mikayla_starstuff 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If they can convince a woman that they might die without sex, then why wouldn't they keep doing it? Men use what works and there are a lot of gullible women out there.
My ex husband had me convinced that he had blue balls.
2006-08-25 04:13:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
i know what you mean a woman can go months without sex and no complain but a man has a hard time going 20 min i think there brain is hard wired to breed they seem to have 1 purpose and thats to make babies
2006-08-25 04:14:00 · answer #8 · answered by the ole ball and chain 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
According to your logic, you could substitute "love" for "sex" in your question. You're using bad logic because you're pissed off. Calm down and realize that sex might mean different things to different people. Or, I suppose your way of looking at the world is the correct one.
2006-08-25 04:19:42 · answer #9 · answered by whudda 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
WOW have a fight with a boyfriend lately? LOL i've felt that way myself when i'm angry with my husband. They can't equate nice to sex. My husband would take sex over food or water.
2006-08-25 04:12:27 · answer #10 · answered by notyours 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋