2500 Volunteer troops dying for something they believe in is a far less offense than killing thousands of Iraqi children during his presidency:
Clinton's war crimes, due to his policy of sanctions on Iraq, and regular bombing attacks that resulted in civilian casualties. UNICEF reported that in 1999 more than 1 million Iraqi children under 5 were suffering from chronic malnutrition, and some 4,000-5,000 children are dying per month beyond normal death rates from the combination of malnutrition and disease. Death from disease was greatly increased by a shortage of potable water and medicines, that led to a 20-fold increase in malaria (among other ailments). This sanctions system, caused more than a million excess deaths, and it is claimed by John and Karl Mueller that Clinton's "sanctions of mass destruction" have caused "the deaths of more people in Iraq than have been slain by all so-called weapons of mass destruction [nuclear and chemical] throughout all history" (Foreign Affairs, May/June 1999). U.S. mainstream reporters somehow never reported the thousands of malnourished children caused by your lying, impeached, dishonored and disbarred rapist and murderer president Clinton!
2006-08-25 03:25:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cherie 6
·
3⤊
4⤋
That's quite interesting. I'd like to know just how much of it's true. Strange coincidence that so many are dead. That's really not normal in any situation, especially with "suicides". I guess I'll have to check into this further. Good question because it brings up alot of points. And for those that don't know why this is valid after he's out of office, the answer is that it's a known fact that his WIFE is considering running for the office of President.
Thanks for giving me something to research!!
2006-08-25 03:36:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by HEartstrinGs 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure was a better time economically, though. I'm fairly confident that ALL politicians are evil in some way or another.
2006-08-25 03:22:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Clinton knew a lot of people- avery personable guy
funny question though!
2006-08-25 03:20:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Clinton, whoremonger, liar, scumbag, coward, may be a lot of things, but he is not responsible for these deaths.
Now, Clinton was close to a lot of criminals, like drug dealers (like his brother!), real estate scammers, savings and loan thieves, Red Chinese bagmen, etc, but was meticulous about keeping some distance between himself and their activities.
Clinton may be a criminal scumbag, but he's not a murderer.
2006-08-25 03:32:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
People die all the time. To blame it on a single person is ludicrous. Don't you have anything better to do? BTW: No one died when Clinton lied - think about it. George Bush LIED to the American people about the military intelligence on Iraq, and look what happened. I don't think George Bush is evil - just incompetent - which may be even worse.
2006-08-25 03:24:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Paul H 6
·
0⤊
4⤋
And I thought the liberals were the ones to bring up stupid conspiracy theories.
In order to get an answer, you have to ask a question.
2006-08-25 03:18:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Pitchow! 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Alot of suicides. But this is the internet, this might not be true.
2006-08-25 03:23:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow... a middle-aged guy has acquaintances who've died.
Very suspicious.
2006-08-25 06:29:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Zhimbo 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
That list would pale in comparassion to the Bush's (41 & 43).
2006-08-25 03:24:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by vertical732 4
·
0⤊
5⤋