This guy is a sick man but a lot of the evidence that detectives are finding don't match to murder. I think that he did have the obessesion with a six year old pagent queen and maybe he did rape her but i don't think that he murdered her. the stuff he is telling officials don't match up but that doesn't mean that he isn't going to be convicted. The law states that everyone is innocent until proven guilty. In cases like this that shoudn't be used because a so called murderer shouldn't being riding in style on a first class plane ride from Thailand to America. I mean he did confess to the murder of Jonbenet Ramsey. This dangerous man is being treated like a heroe being served champagne and hot towls, it just doesn't make any sense!!! I think that John Mark Karr is covering up for someone who did kill Jonbenet and maybe John Mark Karr saw the murder when it took place but I don't believe that he killed her. But I do think that John Mark Karr knows exactly who the real murderer is.
2006-08-25 03:12:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by dancingstarr92 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
My thoughts on this case are:
1) The Boulder CO police could have done a better job investigating the crime if they had gone to the local Kindergarten Class & put them in charge of the case.
2) When the Police were offered more experienced help in the case they declined. It was months before they finally admitted that they were out of their league.
3) The Ramseys hindered their own daughters murder investigation, by digging in their heels & refusing to be interviewed by investigators when they learned that they were being treated as suspects. Of course they had to be investigated as suspects until they are cleared, it's standard proceedure that could have been put aside early on had they cooperated.
4) The Ramseys lack of cooperation further hindered the investigation because they acted more like suspects than concerned parents. Their legal council was evidently partly to blame for this.
5) John Mark Karr single handedly brought this case back into the light after it sat cold for more that 10yrs. He is a sick person, & whether or not he actually has anything to do with the murder of Jon Bennet Ramsey will have to be determined by DNA evidence, since it appears he would confess to the assasination of Abraham Lincoln if he thought it would do him any good.
2006-08-25 11:15:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by No More 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Right. He confessed. Along with many other healthy and mentally ill people languishing in prison because it's easier to do that than investigate. Maybe he did but I worry more about the people who answer questions like this with hearts full of violence and vengeance. I wouldn't want to meet them on a dark street or accidentally hit their bumpers either.
2006-08-25 10:23:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by grapeshenry 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I THINK HE SHOULD BE GIVIN TO THE DAD AND MOM FOR A DAY.W/NO RECOURSE ON LAW ACTIONS.HE WILL GO TO DEATH ROW.AND NEVER FRY.JUST STAY THERE SO WE CAN PAY HIS YEARLY PRISON FEEs.SOMEWHERE ABOUT 110,000.00 A YEAR PER INMATE.AND GIVE HIM MORE RIGHTS THAN YOU HAVE.I KNOW I WAS A PRISON GUARD.MAX PRISON CLASS B.NYS.FIRST THING THEY GO EAT BREAKFAST AND THAN TO THE WEIGHT ROOM TO WORK OUT FOR FOUR HOURS.GAMES,IN THE PM>>>THERE OWN T.Vs CD PLAYERS,A NICE CELL.BETTER THAN YOUR BEDROOM.FREEBEs.SODAS,AND CIGS,CANDY.SOME MAKE HOOCH,AND OTHERS DEAL DRUGs.MONEY AND HITs THROUGH THE SYSTEM.BETTER FOOD THAN YOU EAT.MEDICAL FREE,DRUGS FREE.CONFINED MAYBE,BUT TREATED LIKE THERE THERE ON A LONG VACATION.PLAY THE GAME AND THEY GET TO BE A TRUSTY,CELL GATE OPENS AT 8 am AND CLOSES at 8pm.TRUSTED,MY ***?THAN WHY ARE THEY THERE IF THERE SO TRUSTED/??
2006-08-25 10:20:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by lickit4u 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, as of today they are releasing him to face charges in California for child porn. DNA did not match. He's a nutcase but they can't find the evidence to support his confession. I suppose he'll make a fortune on mag, book and movie deals..to support his globe trotting lifestyle.... Right????
2006-08-29 02:44:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jonh Karr is definately a weirdo, but it is unknown yet is he is the actual killer. His ex wife claims he was not in Colorado when she was killed. She hates her ex and wouldn't lie to cover up for him.
2006-08-25 10:05:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Fleur de Lis 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably was paid for taking the blame. Still am suspicious of the mother though. Only time will tell
2006-08-25 10:05:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by DyrtByrd 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Like the shoe bomber, Richard Reid, he should be put away quietly, and left to rot. If he's guilty.
If not, he wasted our time and he should be just put away. Criminal should not get the notoriety they enjoy. They're nothing special.
It's the whole "If you misbehave, I'll write your name on the blackboard" syndrom.
2006-08-25 10:14:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by TiM 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
sometimes i wish the media would not give him anymore air time at all. at least no more actual viewing. we must report but not until preliminaries and then some proceedings and then rulings and judgments. that's it. no glory, for the killing of an angel on earth. make him pay for the flights to america and to colo. freeze and take his bank savings, donate to programs for children...
2006-08-25 10:14:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by lee f 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who gives a crap. It happened 10 years ago. Do you give a flip about the guy they murdered three blocks from your house? Didn't think so.
2006-08-25 10:02:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by morningstar 3
·
0⤊
0⤋