2006-08-25 02:54:44 · 13 answers · asked by urherebozo 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Seriously? This can't be a real question. CAN'T BE!! W. didn't deserve the terms he already had. Hell, he even lost the popular vote once! Stupid electoral college.
2006-08-25 03:02:38 · answer #1 · answered by barelyliterate 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Does he deserve a 3rd term? I would answer yes, he's been the best president in the last 18 years.
Even if it means amending the constitution? No, for every great president who gets a 3rd term there would be a horrible one who got a third term. Can you imagine if Bill Clinton had been able to run for a third term?
The 2 term limit was instituted upon George Washington's suggestion if I remember correctly. He was a superb president, but even he could have been corrupted by the power that a president has. Power has a way of corrupting even the best of men and that is why the 2 term limit is important and neccesary even if it means losing a great president like G.W. Bush.
The only thing we can do is pray that we have a candidate to vote for in the next election that will lead the country with moral convictions and remain true to the principles this nation was founded on.
2006-08-25 03:21:26 · answer #2 · answered by omilian1 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Term Limits buddy, although King George would love to have a 3rd term.
I agree with the guy that asked if you were insane. There is no solution to the problems going on internationally at the moment. But what this administration has done, with The Patriot Act, Total Information Awareness. Hell, they have a scandal each week that makes you forget the scandal from the week before.
Although, they do need to get into the Diebold and ES&S Voting Machines and make sure they take the FIX out, or he may win again without even being on the ballot...lol
2006-08-25 03:06:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think in the long run it would be good. But I think also that the American people are looking for a quick fix to all the problems and will vote someone else in whether they have the skills to do the job or not. We are in an age now where problems do not get fixed in 4 to 8 years.
2006-08-25 02:59:09 · answer #4 · answered by Just Another Guy 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
NO, I am a Bush supporter but we have placed limits on the presidency to keep it from getting stale. I would hope that we can get another conservative in there but the guard does need to change to bring some fresh ideas.
2006-08-25 03:06:36 · answer #5 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
After six years of the stupid bastard we'll all be damned lucky to see a 2008. Dream on and swallow.
Thanx 4 the 2.
2006-08-25 03:13:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Are you insane?
I wouldn't be surprised if we get attacked a few months before the election and he finds a reason to suspend elections and stay in power.
That's the only way he'll stay in office. When your approval rating is "on the rise" to 40%, you're not going to get re-elected.
2006-08-25 02:58:18 · answer #7 · answered by WBrian_28 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
are you fricking nuts
why would you think that
he might be worse then Jimmy Carter was
maybe we can get him elected to a congress seat in Iraq or Iran
2006-08-25 03:05:31 · answer #8 · answered by matzaballboy 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely not. We have term limits that must be respected.
2006-08-25 03:03:26 · answer #9 · answered by MEL T 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, but I support him for Emperor!
2006-08-25 03:00:48 · answer #10 · answered by Michael S 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋