Yes.
2006-08-25 00:46:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a Democrat.
I used to be a Republican, but the Republican Party sent me so much spam mail I switched.
I realy hate spam.
I don't hate our very Liberal President Bush. Bush is the best and most Liberal President since President Clinton, and he is almost as honest as President Clinton.
It is not Bush's fault that he failed to prevent the worst attack ever on the continential United States, and that he failed to prevent the only successful attack ever against the Pentagon. Bush is not responsible.
How could he have known about the plot since he never even read Dr. Rice's Aug 2001 warning to him? Bush is not responsible.
It was good that Bush had Osama bin Laden's family flown safely out of the country when all other flights were grounded. They might have been attacked by terorrists. Bush attending an Islamic religious service shortly after the Sep 11 attacks. Oh, this was brilliant politics! Appeasing the terrorists like that!
No, I don't hate Bush, I respect him for doing what he believes is right, even if everyone else feels he has ignored the will and safety of his country. He is much more important than anyone else in the country.
And this gas price thing, stop whining, it is not Bush or Cheney's fault! Besides, my oil company stocks are way up! Count your blessings, don't be a whiner! Bush is not responsible.
God Bless America and God Bless President Bush
2006-08-25 01:17:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
The socialists in the democratic party will do ANYTHING to regain power, and I mean anything. The "hate bush" thing came about prior to the 2004 election when the socialists backed by billionaires George Soros, John Hunting, Peter Lewis and John Harris determined to take out George and spent an ungodly amount of money and lost. This loss in 2004 as well as the continued loss of Congress since 1994 have essentially taken its toll on the party.
What used to be a party of liberal moderates has been taken over by a group of hardcore socialists with political leanings slightly left of Lenin and a mental stability of the guy on the corner with the signs and tin cup. They are paranoid to an extreme degree. Please read the link below about the paranoid style of politics, it makes a lot of sense about what has happened to the party.
Since socialists are almost always in bed with the pacifists you now have a new party that wants to take your rights and not protect the country.
The socialists have never had a foreign relations plan other than to "talk" to a lot of people. The subscribe to the one world government theory of the UN but with socialists in control, oops made a mistake, the UN is already controlled and run by socialists, but our socialists want to run the new government, you know like Queen Hillary.
The socialists will not use preemptive force to save American lives, it is also in the UN charter that you have to let the terrorists attack and kill your innocent women and children before you can retaliate. So if you vote dem, you can expect to have ISLAMOFASCISTS come to America and kill people, that much is guaranteed.
The only thing I wish is that they would come out of the closet, quit calling themselves liberals or democrats and call it what they are, SOCIALISTS. I would like America to know who and what they are about.
2006-08-25 02:40:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by rmagedon 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am not a democrat. I am a registered republican. However, I do not mindlessly swallow the garbage that Bush and the republican "leadership" spews to the masses. If you think that anything being done about terrorism now is an idea that came to Bush, you are sadly mistaken. Think Cheney/Rumsfeld. Those are the two who are driving this agenda. Bush is just the puppet with the family money and friends who could get elected.
Start thinking for yourself.
2006-08-25 00:53:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by troythom 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, I don't believe in Partisan Politics
Because he has decieved Americans and abused our trust.
Democrats aren't doing anything but banging their heads against the wall of partisan politics but to be honest if a Democrat came up with a solution to the perils that America faces would Republicans listen? Or Vise versa?
I have a great plan on terror. Stop movitvating terrorists to hate us. When foriegn powers opress a country and dictate the behavior of it's people they create zealots and fanatics. Or at least that's how it worked for the American War of Independance.
2006-08-25 00:51:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by W0LF 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yah, guess I'm a Democrat. You're right that the party doesn't have an agenda at the moment, or any real leadership.
I can't tell you a person with a decent plan for dealing with terrorism, neither republican or democrat, and thats a shame
2006-08-28 13:32:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure that it is hate, but Bush is disliked so much because the only thing he has done about terrorism is make it worse. A better solution might be to go after terrorists instead of invading countries that had NOTHING to do with terrorism. Now we have made Iraq a hotbead for terrorists.
2006-08-25 00:48:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by happytraveler 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
I don't hate. But, if I were to hate, it probably would be directed at anyone who knowingly aided a monster like Hitler, as the Bush family wholeheartedly did, supplying him with up to one-third of the funds and raw materials that were used in the Holocaust. I especially resent the fact that George W. Bush is a business partner with Osama Bin laden's family, even giving Osama's brother, Salem, the Houston Gulf Airport before becoming President. And, THEN, to send our people to fight and suffer and die in the Middle East just to provide security forces for private oil interests. Many people in the world today have legitimate, good reasons to hate the Bush family, good enough to wait until the Democrats were out of office before attacking the U.S. on 9/11.
http://www.tarpley.net/bush2.htm
http://www.bartcop.com/421102.htm
Check also the United States "Trading With the Enemy Act" of October 20, 1942 signed by President Roosevelt to force the Bush family to cease providing funds and supplies to Hitler.
2006-08-25 01:07:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I used to be but no more. They have sit on their rears during all this tripe and done nothing. I am now an Independent I guess. I will vote for the man or woman no matter what party. I think Hillary would be an excellent President and would vote for her in a NY second...
2006-08-25 00:50:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
i think the word "plan" is a bit strong.
do you really believe that arresting sadam hussain has made america safer from terrorism?
if im missing some part of bush's plan, please fill me in....
i dont hate bush, i fear him. only because he is about the most powerfull single man on the planet, and couldn't outsmart a welk.
2006-08-25 00:46:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
THE ONE, AND ABSOLUTE..ONLY REASON PEOPLE USE THE WORD "HATE" AGAINST THE PRESIDENT IS BECAUSE THE LIBERALS ARE NOT IN POWER AND BECAUSE THEIR MAN KLINTOON WAS IMPEACHED FOR LYING UNDER OATH...THEY ARE INCENSED THAT THEY LOST 2 MAJOR ELECTIONS...THE LIBERALS HAVE NO PLAN...AS STATED BY ANOTHER WHO ANSWERED THIS QUESTION IS I HATE BUSH, THAT'S ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW....THUS...NO SOLUTION, ANSWERS,...TO THEIR HATRED...LIBERALS ARE AND HAVE ALWAYS BEEN QUICK TO USE THE WORD :HATE"...SAD BUT TRUE.
2006-08-25 02:55:01
·
answer #11
·
answered by bushfan88 5
·
0⤊
0⤋