Bush is no good, but don't compare him to Hitler. You make Hitler sound like a common thief. Hitler was a dictator who tried to take over half the world and was responsible for over 30 million deaths. Bush, he is just a bad president who doesnt know when to listen to reason and when to listen to his greedy friends.
2006-08-24 21:57:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Darcia 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
One need not be a fan of GWB to realize comparisons to Hitler are stupid.
Just a few important differences
Hitler was ruler for life - Bush will step down in 2 years
Hitler was the supreme ruler of his country - Bush is restrained by the Congress and Supreme Court.
Hitler outlawed all political parties but the Nazis - Bush and the GOP must still compete with the Democrats.
Hitler set up Aushwitz - Bush set up Gitmo (that's a difference not a similarity)
Hitler overthrew democracies and instituted dictatorships - Bush overthrew dictatorships and instituted democracies.
Hitler destroyed German synogoges - Bush visits American mosques
Hitler imprisoned his critics - Bush's critics are free to say what they want.
2006-08-25 13:59:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by winston s 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is a huge difference between Bush and Hitler. Hitler was a short, incestous, genocidal madman bent on conquering the world. He was truly nutty.
Bush, on the other hand, is a person who works to liberate people, Hitler wanted to enslave people.
2006-08-25 05:10:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by SMARTIE 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hitler was Ostrian----Bush is American
Hitler was highly addicted to amphetamines an excuse for some things he did and tried to do.
Bush might hit the bottle a bit but has no excuse.
They both share the same addiction -- power .
All dictators have been known to fail
Unfortunately if this happens
We all lose.
2006-08-25 05:34:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ron~N 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush got to learn from Hitler. Hence why he hasn't started a genocide...yet.
Whats happening now, is almost exactly the same thing that happened in Germany prior to WWII. Even the use of terrorism to usher in more government power.
2006-08-25 07:37:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by cat_Rett_98 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats a stretch.
Holocost, SS, SA, approval rating above 40%. This are all things Hitler had that Bush doesn't.
2006-08-28 20:27:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hitler was died,Bush is still in the world.
2006-08-25 05:22:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Wenosn 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
well, asking similarity insteed of diff. would be much better.
and yes abt the diff.
Bush is luky guy that his country people gave him one more chance & elected him as their presedent. Though Hitler wasnt that lucky i guess.
Yes another difference is Hitler is a one face man on the other hand bush is wearing so many masks. A diff. one for diff. country.
2006-08-25 05:10:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by ami 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The past wanted to be King on planet earth.
The present is at loss with ghost stories of little children playing computer games on planet earth.
With the Mummy risen from the graveyards scaring the hell and living daylights out of living human kind on planet earth.
2006-08-25 04:57:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well Hitler lied about the past in order to change the future to his liking...oh yeah, no big difference really!
2006-08-25 04:58:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
1⤋