English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In the scene where Lebanon not has strong and trained army. While Israeal is 4th most powerful army of the world. and has very aggrassive designs and plans against the Muslim countries.
plz be serious and logical in answering
thanks

2006-08-24 19:06:47 · 19 answers · asked by 3mi 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

19 answers

Of course not! Hezbollah should never be disarmed! The problem is not with the Muslims, but with the Israelis. Of all things, Israel is the most warloving and barbaric country I have ever heard of. Hezbollah is simply defending its country, and have you realized yet that it does not attack, but only defends and counterattacks?! You people are so ignorant of the truth and unwilling to realize it! Muslims are peacemakers, and only fight when fighting is needed. The word Islam literally means "peace", or "salam".

2006-08-25 00:32:16 · answer #1 · answered by bluebelle93 1 · 0 1

because of the fact they symbolize the aspirations and carry out the purposes of the state with interior the southern Lebanon and Beckkar valley section. To the human beings who fall decrease than their administration they are their protector against what they see and an aggressive potential that the Hezbollah effectively defeated and forced to retreat from their fatherland. could desire to the UN risk-free practices council have authorized tension to disarm the Hezbollah then it may be as possibly that such an action could have become a brilliant as disaster the the u . s .'s attack on Iraq. To the human beings interior the Hezbollah factors and various hundreds of thousands of folk Bin weighted down is a is a brilliant hero and the George Washington of the middle east and Bush is a warfare criminal. the u . s . does not adjust to all UN resolutions, for this reason neither do different international locations. additionally the u . s . is over committed and isn't any longer able to subdue Iraq, there is no reason to think of the u . s . could be waiting to attain disarmament of the Hezbollah. The Hezbollah has already attacked and defeated American marines in Lebanon and forced the american Marines to withdraw as quickly as already.

2016-12-11 15:02:43 · answer #2 · answered by bornhoft 4 · 0 0

Why not try asking a serious and logical question. There are less that 16 million Jews in the entire world and about 1 billion Muslims. Do you think Israel is really a threat? They were acting in self defense against Hezbollah terrorists. Of course Hezbollah should be disarmed.

2006-08-24 20:19:56 · answer #3 · answered by Carl 7 · 0 0

yes Hezbollah should be disarm and no Israel doesn't plan against the Muslim countries look at Egypt and Jordan they made peace and all three benefited their economies when up because of the peace treaty. and Lebanon can get help from the United Nations. But in the other hand we always hear Iran saying that Israel shouldn't exist and that they should be destroyed. so that is and never ending conflict if Hezbollah doesn't disarm the conflict will start again and the Leibniz people and Israelis are the ones getting hurt and the leader of Hezbollah I think that he is not even Lebanese.

2006-08-24 19:18:40 · answer #4 · answered by Armamdo H 1 · 0 1

Your assertion that Israel has designs and plans against muslim countries is baseless. It is the other way around; they call for the destruction of Israel or deny its existence. Israel only responds when attacked.

Further, Israel has only attacked the Hezbollox terrorist force after their incursion and rocket attacks. It did not attack the Lebanese army. It wants a legitimate Lebanses army to control Lebanon, not Hezbollox terrorsts.

The only reason Lebanon was unable to rebuild its army was its occupation by Syria and the resulting corruption of its economy and political system. Iran then built Hezbollox as an attack force to be used against Israel.

Thus the current situation can be squarely blamed on Iran and the islamofascists.

In answer to the question, yes, it should be disarmed.

2006-08-24 19:15:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It doesn't appear that the current situation pits Israel against Lebanon. It's Hezbollah and Israel who are in conflict. So your phrasing of Lebanon as helpless against Israel doesn't line up to logic.
What I'm saying is that your opinion is coming out, and this isn't an actual question at all.

2006-08-24 19:10:17 · answer #6 · answered by Privatize 2 · 0 1

Muslims are the problem, they want to control the world, and return it to the dark ages. Lebanon will be strong once Hezbollah is removed, and it will happen.

2006-08-24 19:15:48 · answer #7 · answered by grey smily 3 · 0 1

Everyone sucks!

Zionist Israel
Terrorist Hezbollah
Idiot Lebanon.

Only people I think don't suck are the innocent civilians.

Israel shouldn't have invaded. Hezbollah shouldn'tve given them reason to. Lebanon should've done what the UN said.

Period.

2006-08-24 19:11:18 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 1 0

I believe that Hezbollah should be disarmed. Israeal was just protecting it's self. Just like we would do if we were attacked. Hezbollah is nothing but a terriost group and should be stopped

2006-08-24 19:11:47 · answer #9 · answered by lita ozzy bear 3 · 0 1

Yes, Hezbollah should be disarmed. Hezbollah is very well trained by the Iranians.

2006-08-24 19:14:41 · answer #10 · answered by MorgantonNC 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers